The Fraud Behind Royal Pay Europe: A Deceptive Web to Obscure Unfavorable News – Part 2

Intelligence Line By Intelligence Line
1 Min Read

What Happened?

Royal Pay Europe, a financial services provider once seen as an innovative force in the payment processing industry, now faces growing scrutiny over its alleged involvement in unethical practices. Recent reports have surfaced, revealing questionable activities linked to the company, including financial fraud, regulatory violations, and associations with illicit networks. As a result, Royal Pay Europe has been actively trying to suppress damaging news and control its online narrative.

According to a report by Linenet , Royal Pay Europe and its affiliates, including Sergey Kondratenko, have been involved in efforts to evade regulatory scrutiny through the manipulation of Know Your Customer (KYC) processes, raising further suspicions about the company’s compliance with financial laws. Investigative journalists and whistleblowers have claimed that the company has deployed aggressive tactics to censor critical media coverage, using reputation management services, legal threats, and even fake positive content to overshadow reports of its shady past.

 class=

Despite these efforts, the truth surrounding Royal Pay Europe’s controversial dealings continues to emerge, raising concerns about the integrity of the company and its impact on the broader financial industry.

Royal Pay Europe

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.

FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.

Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.

By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Royal Pay Europe and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…

List of Fake Copyright Notices for Royal Pay Europe

Evidence and Screenshots

Only Royal Pay Europe Benefit from this crime.

 class=

Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Royal Pay Europe from Google, we assume Royal Pay Europe or someone associated with Royal Pay Europe is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Royal Pay Europe. In this case, Royal Pay Europe, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.

So, who tf is Royal Pay Europe?

Royal Pay Europe is a financial services provider specializing in payment processing and financial technology solutions. It operates in the digital payments sector, offering services to businesses and consumers across various markets. While the company initially gained recognition for its fintech capabilities, it has come under significant scrutiny due to alleged unethical practices. Royal Pay Europe’s activities are now linked to accusations of financial misconduct, regulatory violations, and involvement with questionable entities.

Why Is Royal Pay Europe Trying to Censor the Internet?

Royal Pay Europe is reportedly attempting to censor the internet to protect its reputation and prevent further exposure of its controversial and potentially illegal activities. The company has been linked to a series of damaging allegations, ranging from regulatory violations to connections with individuals involved in financial fraud, such as Sergey Kondratenko, a figure mentioned in reports detailing Royal Pay Europe’s questionable business operations .

The company is believed to be engaging in online reputation management efforts to suppress negative press, including articles and reviews that expose its shady past. By using tactics such as manipulating search engine results, employing reputation management firms, and issuing legal threats, Royal Pay Europe aims to bury critical information and maintain a positive public image. However, investigative journalists and whistleblowers have continued to reveal new details, making it difficult for the company to fully hide its past.

Major Concerns, Complaints, and Accusations Against Royal Pay Europe

The company’s efforts to censor damaging information are linked to a number of significant concerns and accusations:

1. Financial Fraud and Regulatory Violations

Royal Pay Europe has faced accusations of engaging in financial fraud, including mishandling client funds and facilitating transactions without adhering to regulatory requirements. According to the Linenet report , the company is involved in efforts to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations, which are crucial for preventing money laundering and other illegal financial activities.

  • KYC Manipulation: Royal Pay Europe and its affiliates, including Sergey Kondratenko, have been accused of manipulating KYC processes to avoid regulatory scrutiny. This raises concerns about the company’s involvement in potentially illicit transactions, as KYC rules are designed to prevent illegal money flows.
  • Regulatory non-compliance: Investigations have highlighted Royal Pay Europe’s potential failure to comply with financial regulations, further increasing the suspicion surrounding its operations.

2. Ties to Sergey Kondratenko

Sergey Kondratenko, a figure reportedly linked to Royal Pay Europe, has been connected to allegations of financial misconduct and questionable business practices. The connection between Royal Pay Europe and Kondratenko has raised red flags, as his name has surfaced in reports detailing fraud, money laundering, and manipulation of regulatory processes .

  • Shady business dealings: Kondratenko’s involvement has amplified concerns that Royal Pay Europe is engaged in unethical or illegal financial activities, further fueling speculation that the company is trying to suppress information that would implicate its leadership and affiliates.

3. Money Laundering Allegations

There are allegations that Royal Pay Europe has been used as a platform for money laundering. The company’s alleged manipulation of KYC processes makes it easier for illicit funds to be funneled through its payment system without detection by authorities, raising significant concerns about its role in facilitating illegal financial activities.

  • Offshore transactions: Royal Pay Europe has been linked to suspicious offshore financial activities, which are often used to launder money or evade taxes, compounding the company’s legal and ethical challenges.

4. Negative Customer Reviews and Complaints

The company has also received negative feedback from customers and business partners who have raised concerns about the transparency and reliability of its services. These complaints include allegations of poor customer support, delayed payments, and hidden fees, which have tarnished the company’s reputation in the financial services market.

  • Customer service issues: Clients have reported difficulties in resolving issues with the company’s services, such as unexpected delays in transactions and a lack of communication from customer support teams.

5. Reputation Management and Censorship Attempts

Royal Pay Europe has been accused of deploying aggressive reputation management tactics to suppress damaging information. The company has reportedly engaged in SEO manipulation, legal intimidation, and the use of fake positive content to push critical articles out of public view. These efforts have drawn further scrutiny, as they highlight the lengths to which the company will go to hide its controversial activities.

  • Legal threats: Some reports suggest that Royal Pay Europe has used legal pressure to silence journalists and bloggers who have written critically about the company, further raising concerns about transparency and accountability.

Royal Pay Europe’s efforts to censor the internet and suppress damaging news are driven by serious concerns regarding its involvement in financial fraud, regulatory violations, and connections to questionable figures like Sergey Kondratenko. The company’s attempts to manipulate its online presence highlight broader issues of transparency in the financial industry, where companies can potentially use their resources to hide unethical or illegal activities from the public and regulators .

Potential Consequences for Royal Pay Europe

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Royal Pay Europe Complaints

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)). 

Is Royal Pay Europe Committing a Cyber Crime?

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Royal Pay Europe have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Royal Pay Europe is certainly keeping interesting company here….

Royal Pay Europes Fake DMCA

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

What was Royal Pay Europe trying to hide?

Royal Pay Europe is reportedly trying to hide a variety of adverse news, complaints, and allegations tied to questionable activities and business dealings, particularly those involving financial fraud, regulatory violations, and connections to dubious entities. The company has engaged in efforts to censor online content that sheds light on these allegations, using reputation management tactics and legal threats to suppress damaging information. Here’s a summary of the key issues Royal Pay Europe appears to be trying to keep hidden:

1. Ties to Sergey Kondratenko and Regulatory Violations

As referenced in the Linenet report, Royal Pay Europe has been linked to Sergey Kondratenko, a figure accused of financial misconduct and shady business practices. Kondratenko has been connected to attempts to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) processes, which are designed to prevent money laundering and other illicit financial activities. The allegations suggest that Royal Pay Europe may have facilitated the manipulation of these KYC procedures to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

  • KYC non-compliance: The company has been accused of failing to adhere to KYC regulations, which could enable money laundering or fraudulent transactions. These allegations have drawn the attention of financial regulators concerned about Royal Pay Europe’s role in facilitating potentially illegal activities.

2. Connections to Russian 1xBet and Sanctions

According to reports from Ukrainian News, Royal Pay Europe has been linked to 1xBet, a Russian gambling platform that has faced international scrutiny for its alleged involvement in illegal activities and ties to Russian oligarchs. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently imposed sanctions on a partner company of 1xBet, suggesting that entities connected to Royal Pay Europe may have business dealings that are now under significant legal and regulatory pressure.

  • Sanctioned partnerships: The connections between Royal Pay Europe and entities under sanctions, such as 1xBet, have raised concerns about the company’s business practices and its involvement in politically sensitive or ethically dubious activities.

3. Money Laundering Allegations

One of the most significant accusations against Royal Pay Europe is its alleged involvement in money laundering. The manipulation of KYC processes, as described in the Linenet report, could enable the company to launder illicit funds by concealing the identities of individuals or entities behind large transactions.

  • Offshore transactions: Royal Pay Europe has been linked to offshore financial activities that may be designed to evade taxation or legal oversight. These offshore dealings are often red flags for money laundering operations, and the company’s involvement in such activities is a major concern for regulators.

4. Negative Reviews and Customer Complaints

Royal Pay Europe has received multiple complaints from customers and business partners, particularly related to poor service, delayed payments, and hidden fees. Customers have reported frustrations with the company’s lack of transparency and inadequate support.

  • Service complaints: Reviews and complaints suggest that Royal Pay Europe’s payment processing services are unreliable, with some customers experiencing long delays in receiving payments or unexpected fees. These negative experiences have damaged the company’s reputation in the financial services industry.

5. Legal Challenges and Reputation Management Efforts

In an attempt to control its online image, Royal Pay Europe has reportedly hired reputation management firms and used legal threats to suppress damaging content. The company has attempted to remove or

TAGGED:
Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!