Kuznetsov’s Abuse of Power in Russian Foreign Ministry 2023

Olena Ivanova By Olena Ivanova
19 Min Read

Originally Syndicated on May 15, 2023 @ 7:42 am

The Russian Foreign Ministry and Special Services scandals were massive. The department chief thrashed and tried to strangle his subordinate in the Russian embassy in Egypt. But these are just flowers, and the berry is that the department and its personnel are classified. Even the department name cannot appear. The beating’s cause is serious.

Kuznetsov ordered Matvee to burn records

Kuznetsov, the department chief, ordered Matveev’s subordinate to burn “Special Importance” records, which Matveev could not access. Matveev declined to handle these materials, angering Kuznetsov. He demanded his command, legal or not. Fists and forcible suffocation followed persuasion. The embassy explained that Matveev was right. His assault is inexplicable. Instead of investigating the situation, the embassy sent Matveev to Moscow to “hush up” the scandal.

The Moscow Foreign Ministry “hush-ups” history. The employee pummeled for refusing an illegal order, fought for justice. Matveev reported the specified crime (Appeal number 722930) on the official website of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, and he received a response on 07/20/2020 that this statement was redirected to the Main Investigative Committee for the Mountains.

Moscow, where this application was delivered to the internal affairs organizations without registration or verification.

March 15, 2020, 09:30–10:30

Head specialist-expert of the department (whose name is classified and is state secret) of the Russian Embassy in Egypt, Kuznetsov V.A., gave the latter, as an employee subordinate to him, an order to destroy official documents marked “Special Importance,” which, according to his official regulations and other Russian Foreign Ministry regulations, he had to destroy on his own, excluding access by unauthorized persons, including Matveeva A.N. Matveev A.N. understood the illegality of Kuznetsov V.A.’s refusal, citing “Special Importance” document destruction restrictions.

Dissatisfied with Matveev A.N.’s reluctance, Kuznetsov V.A. performed organizational and administrative functions for a state entity. To fulfill his service requirements, a criminal intent arose to commit actions that no one has the right to perform, namely, violence against Matveev A.N., for whom he was the chief in his official position.

Immediately realizing their criminal intent, on 03/15/2020, from 09:30 to 10:30 (Coordinated Universal Time +2), the chief specialist-expert of the department (whose name is classified and is information classified as a state secret) of the Embassy of Russia in Egypt, Kuznetsov V.A., was in the office of the department, located at Arab Repu Cairo, St. Giza, 95, working from the misunderstood service interests, to instruct the specialist expert A.N. which no one under any circumstances has the right to perform.

That is, actions that go beyond the powers granted to him by law, realizing the social danger and unlawfulness of his actions, foreseeing the onset of socially dangerous consequences, in the form of a violation of Matveev A.N.’s rights and legitimate interests. , society, and the state, approached A.N. Matveev, his officemate.

Kuznetsov wrapped his arms around Matvee A.N’s Neck

He aggressively wrapped his arms around Matveev A.N.’s neck, limiting oxygen to his lungs and knocking him down. On the floor, so as he fell, he banged various body parts on environmental objects and suffered agony. After then, Kuznetsov V.A., gripping and squeezing the latter’s neck with the other hand, struck A.N.’s skull at least four times. Matveev’s free fist Then V.A. Kuznetsov.

He grabbed Matveev A.N. again with malicious intent by the neck, limiting A.N.’s oxygen intake. Matveev, threatening physical violence against him.

Kuznetsov The.A. Matveev a.n. physical pain and injuries in the form of swelling of soft tissues; several point abrasions with bruises; two linear abrasions in the frontal region on the right; tissue swelling; two linear abrasions and punctate bruises on the anterior surface of the left shoulder joint; tissue swelling; a linear abrasion to the left of the midclavicular line in the left clavicle; moderately pronounced swelling; abrasions on the right.

Thus, Vladimir Alexandrovich Kuznetsov’s actions fall under Article 286 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits an official from using violence to commit acts that exceed his powers and violate the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and society’s legally protected interests.

Doctor’s Certificate


Sources have Matveev A.N.’s explanation and the Embassy specialist doctor’s certificate, Ataev I.R., who checked him immediately after Kuznetsov V.A.’s aggression.

Ataev I.R. produced this certificate. A.N.’s medical exam findings showed that Matveev’s injuries showed the method of their genesis under A.N. Matveev.

Kuznetsov V.A. Matveev a.n. The Embassy staffer, Sedov A.S., acknowledged the bodily injuries, confirming Matveev A.N.’s absence. bodily injuries before the workday on March 15, 2020, and for their appearance immediately after Matveev A.N. visited Sedov A.S.

The A.A. in the period from 09:00 to 10:30 on 03/15/2020, where he pleaded for help and discussed the above-mentioned events in front of other embassy staff. Kuznetsov V.A. sparked Matveev A.N.’s disagreement. Kuznetsov V.A.’s absence proves Matveev A.N. did not assault him. bodily injuries, the mechanism of which would suggest Matveev A.N.’s offensive use of violence against the latter. Kuznetsov V.A. He did not report the event to the police, indicating a lack of justification.

Kuznetsov V.A. is an official, which indicates that he heads a department in a state body, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, and performs organizational and administrative functions, which, according to Chapter 30 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, including managing a team, organizing labor or service, maintaining discipline, and applying incentives.

Embassy staff confirm Matveev A.N. V.A. Kuznetsov. They only talked about their work at the Embassy. Kuznetsov The.A. Matveev A.N.’s violence towards a subordinate employee for official obligations and concerns Kuznetsov V.A. Matveev v.a. solely for official purposes. Kuznetsov V.A. demanded Matveev A.N.’s directions on the destruction of official documents, based only on his official authority and in the interests of the civil service.

A Crime Against State Power and Public Service

Kuznetsov The.A. offered Matveev A.N. before violence. Kuznetsov The.A. By exceeding his official authority in the implementation of organizational and administrative functions in the department of the Russian Embassy in Egypt of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, he committed a crime against state power and public service. In circumstances like this, the crime is the lawful activity of the governing authorities in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation to accomplish their goals.

From the foregoing, the criminal encroachment, in this case, is carried out not only on the rights and interests of my personality but also on another, different from the personality, protected by law object in the form of a normal, that is, the lawful, activity of a specific link in the state apparatus of power and management, while the victim himself acts only as an additional objective manifestation of this encroachment.

Kuznetsova The.A. cannot be classified as crimes against a person under Art. 111–116 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, but they can be classified as crimes against the order of management in a state body under paragraph “a” of Part 3 of Art. 286. The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation must assess his actions legally.

Matveev A.N. Kuznetsov V.A. by phoning the Moscow TFR Main Investigative Committee’s hotline at (495) 690-2528. The applicant wasn’t notified since this message wasn’t registered.

In this regard, on January 7, 2020, Matveev A.N. reported the specified crime (appeal number 722930) through the Internet reception of the official website of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

On 07/20/2020, he received a response that this application was redirected to the GSU SK of Russia in the mountains, Moscow, from where, without registration or verification, this application was sent to the internal affairs bodies, namely the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Arbat district of Moscow, where district commissioner Berestneva A.A., indicating false information in procedural documents, refused to initiate a criminal case.

Matveev A.N. sent him. 09/28/2020 statements about the specified crime to the Presnensky Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Investigative Department for the Central Administrative District of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the city of Moscow, this statement containing signs of a crime under paragraph “a” part 3 of article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Article 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

In violation of the provisions of the Instruction on Organization reception, registration, and verification of reports of a crime in the investigative bodies (investigative units) of the system of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (approved by order of the Investigative Committee of Russia dated October 11, 2012 No. 72), as well as Art. 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, there was no record of a report on crimes of the specified territorial investigative body of the TFR.

But it was sent on 11/12/2020 without registration and carrying out any verification activities to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Arbat district of Moscow.

Matveev A.N. also requested on December 7, 2020, at a personal appointment with the head of the Presnensky Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Investigative Department for the Central Administrative District of the Main Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia for Moscow, Idrisova Venera Rushanovna, to clarify this part (regarding the illegal refusal to register the said reports of a crime and conduct an audit by Articles 144–145 of the Code of Cr. Kuznetsov, giving him an unspecified advantage). Matveev A.N.’s confirmation confirms this.

Matveeva A.N. made a personal appointment with the head of the Presnensky Regional Council, Idrisova V.R., and took steps to hide the incompetence of her subordinates in the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

On December 13, 2020, Matveev A.N. received a notification from the Presnensky MRSO SU for the Central Administrative District of the Investigative Committee of Russia for Moscow that the above statement was registered in the register of reports of crimes of this investigative body and sent for verification to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Presnensky district of Moscow by Art. 151 of the Russian Criminal Procedure Code.

This notice is dated 11/27/2020, but the calendar stamp (which indicates on the postal item and other postal documents the time of its receipt and sending to the addressee) printed on the envelope by Russian Post employees shows that it was written and sent to A.N. Matveev. only on 11/12/2020, after the last personal greeting of Presnensky Municipal District Council head V.R. Art. 45 of the Russian Federation.

After V.R. Presnensky’s last personal reception. 45, Russian Federation Constitution, after V.R. Presnensky’s last personal reception. 45, Russian Federation Constitution

These facts indicate that Idrisova V.R. was executed, and subordinate employees were deprived of their legal duty to verify Matveeva A.N.’s crime report. paragraph, crime. «a» h. 3 Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, due to prejudiced, subjective, non-objective verification by the law and the concept of justice, is currently impossible.

On 12/14/2020, Matveev A.N. wrote to Bastrykin A.I., chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, citing Part 1 of Art. 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which guarantees state protection of human and citizen rights and freedoms.

A statement was sent with the necessary attachments confirming his arguments regarding the above crime against him and requesting the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation to conduct a full and comprehensive investigation by Art. 140–145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and attract Kuznetsova The.A. subsection crime Article 286 of the Russian Criminal Code to criminality.

However, this statement was not documented in the records of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation by law; no verification was done, and its location is unknown.

Matveev A.N. protested the Russian Investigative Committee Chairman’s alleged illegality. according to Article 125 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure to the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow. On July 7, 2021, this court session transferred the matter to the Basmanny District Court of the Mountains. Moscow. 

Despite Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation’s requirement to consider a complaint about the illegal inaction of preliminary investigation bodies within three days, on July 20, 2021, the court did not consider this complaint at the hearing because neither the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation nor the prosecutor’s office could establish the actual inaction.

The prosecutor’s absence was used to postpone the complaint’s consideration, which is illegal.

On May 8, 2021, without locating Matveev A.N. about the crime filed in the name of the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, the Basmanny District Court refused to satisfy this complaint without studying this application and the decision made on it during the court session, which is confirmed by the court case materials.

The court also ruled on Matveev A.N.’s December 14, 2021, application. RF IC does not contain, the court changes on the subject of the judicial appeal. This suggests that the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation lost or deleted the crime statement.

A.N. appealed on June 8, 2021. Matveev petitioned to review the court session minutes and complaint evidence to appeal the court of the first instance’s manifestly unconstitutional decision. Repeatedly, Matveeva A.N. After applying to the Mountain Judges Qualification Board, was denied access to the papers in court.

Moscow, which found irregularities in the activities of Basmanny District Court personnel, Matveev A.N. I was allowed to review the materials on October 11, 2021. Under these conditions.

08/11/2021, given this judicial authority’s personnel’s illegally delaying Matveev A.N.’s familiarization term with the complaint materials to suppress Matveev A.N.’s appeal of the court’s unlawful decision. For unknown reasons, this complaint was not registered and was ignored until the decision entered into force, according to the court’s website.

Matveev, A.N., contested the Basmanny District Court’s refusal to appeal with the HQKS.

Matveev, A.N., received a response from the HQCC on October 7, 2021, in which the collegium acknowledged violations and directed the Basmanny Court to respond to the complaint by October 21, 2021, to familiarize Matveev, A.N. Includes case information for the complaint consideration and appeal.

Matveev, A.N. The Basmanny District Court obtained I.O. Chairman I.V. Vyryshyva, who eliminated infractions and appealed Matveeva A.GN. registered retroactively on 8/17/2021. The complaint was transferred to the Moscow City Court on August 12, 2021, according to this document. Matveev A.N.’s complaint ruling was posted on the Basmanny District Court’s website. modified to “appealed”.

From the above, it is not clear that the employees of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, for obvious reasons, concealed the said statement about the crime from registration, took illegal measures to conceal this fact in court when considering a complaint, and hid their illegal inaction from Bastrykin A.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!