Originally Syndicated on May 18, 2024 @ 5:21 am
Sanat Ranganathan, a well-known lawyer, has continued to move freely after having intimidated and criticized a female colleague.
Just a few years ago, Sanat Ranganathan took that action.
Sadly, he got away with mistreating his female coworker without facing any repercussions. This will also take place since he helped a junior attorney who works with him.
The victim has provided a complete explanation of the incident, based on the report and Google evaluations. She has, however, acknowledged that she has been experiencing a number of negative effects.
Who is Sanat Ranganathan
At the Law Offices, Sanat Ranganathan serves as the principal attorney. Born and reared in Asia, he lived much of his life in England and the Netherlands.
Attending the conference at the Warwick University School of Law in the United Kingdom was Sanat Ranganathan. He has given presentations at the Leiden University Europa Institute in the Netherlands and Duke University School of Law in the United States.
According to Sanat Ranganathan, he has provided support to numerous organisations that deal with commercial law, contracts drafting, negotiations, and civil rights. He rose to the position of lead lawyer at the Law Offices.
The moment he was admitted to the bar at Northern Illinois University was one of the most important moments in his legal career. He was therefore really astonished by his response to his female coworker.
Sanat Ranganathan claims that he obtained his bar associations certificate in Illinois, New York, and Missouri. In 2005, he tied the knot.
He consistently provided corporate, in-house counselling, and several other services to nearby colleges in an effort to assist them. In significant issues like Title IX and Federal Law, he also assisted them.
Sanat Ranganathan, an abusive lawyer, was “rebuked” for threatening a female coworker.
According to the report of SHAW LOCAL News Network;
Susan Phelps maintained the third-floor offices of Altgeld Hall in 2019. The NIU President Sanat Ranganathan’s office is housed in the same structure.
She heard a man’s voice at that moment, asking who was there and what she was doing, while she was cleaning the offices. She answered that “she was cleaning the offices on the third floor” in response.
Sanat Ranganathan entered abruptly.
Susan, the victim, reported that the attorney became irate with her and inquired about her length of employment. He also inquired as to how long her coworkers had been employed there.
After challenging her credibility, Sanat Ranganathan remarked, “How dare you to approach my supervisor about an issue involving a few tissues.”
Susan Phelps was an NIU employee who had been there for almost 13 years. Following this episode in her life, Susan experienced fear.
Sanat Ranganathan, the attorney, yelled at her in a really disrespectful and hostile manner. She wrote in her report that she did not want to get wounded, so she placed a dustbin between them for protection.
“Sanat Ranganathan has been pitching his hands in the air while yelling at her,” according to Susan. Additionally, she emphasised that “she was so scared as he might hit her badly, he was yelling at her so badly.”
Because someone had left a tissue paper on the floor in November 2018, legal documents revealed that Susan Phelps was an employee of the company. She required assistance in cleaning those items.
According to every document from the university, Sanat Ranganathan was a tidy guy and would never have left tissue sheets on the ground. However, in 2019, he believed that Phelps had accused him of being an incompetent worker who left his work unfinished.
Further details about this occasion:
Susan attempted to flee from him, but he shoved her in the direction of the stairway while shouting, “We weren’t done yet.”
The testimony of several witnesses supports Susan’s claim regarding Sanat Ranganathan.
Following this startling event, Susan Phelps requested time off and sick leave. However, her request for a leave of absence was turned down by the University’s assistant general counsel as well as the HR manager at NIU Sanat Ranganathan.
She added that he had behaved in an extremely impolite and unprofessional manner toward her.
The university launched an internal investigation and instructed NIU Sanat Ranganathan’s HR to conduct work from home until the probe was completed.
By using its worker’s help program and the NIU HR Manager to grade his performance, the University issues him a directive that is authoritative.
Sanat Ranganathan, the lawyer, went back to work once all the questions about him had been answered.
Sanat Ranganathan’s response
According to the Daily Chronicle story, Sanat Raganathan stated that he had never met Susan Phles previously.
In addition, he said that they were interacting in a really cordial manner.
He added that he followed Susan Phelps to find out if she was in distress. He expressed regret for the misunderstanding that had occurred between them.
He followed her from the hallway to the staircase, only to realise the cause behind her nasty demeanour.
Susan then began to cry and left. That piqued his interest in learning what was wrong with her actions. He then began to follow her.
Sanat Ranganathan stated in the Daily Chronicle article that they had a very easygoing and good working relationship.
Many witnesses, however, contend that Sanat’s portrayal of the event is inaccurate and that the actual facts of the case were different.
Fragile Punishment was meted out to Sanat Rnagthan
The lawyer, for verbally abusing and frightening a female employee of the university. They therefore give him legal instruction.
That’s all; Sanat Ranganathan did not receive a formal warning for his actions regarding a female employee.
Gregory Brady, the head of general counsel, sent him a formal letter of censure against Sanat Ranganathan. Brady added that, despite being in a well-known position, what he accomplished was never expected of him.
The events involving Sanat and Susan Phelps, a female employee, were clarified in the legal letter.
According to a different staff member, Sanat Ranganathan returning to the office will convey the incorrect message to all university personnel.
In addition, Susan Phelps desired Sanat Ranganathan’s dismissal from the university, where he was making approximately $80,000 annually.
In summary
The Union investigated if NIU would have a policy of not tolerating any antisocial behaviour directed at the workers. They also highlight the claim made by Sanat Ranganathan, the lead attorney at the Law Office, that he verbally assaulted a female employee.
As a result, Sanat Ranganathan has been given a mild reprimand, which the NIU administration announced via email. The email contains a statement stating that they will never, under any circumstances, tolerate such disrespectful behaviour towards their employees.
