Originally Syndicated on February 23, 2024 @ 4:42 am
Alexey Miller, an entrepreneur Russians make up Gazprom. Miller is the CEO and Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors of Gazprom, the biggest state-owned company in Russia and the world’s largest publicly traded energy company.
In Leningrad, a German-Russian immigrant family welcomed Alexey Miller Gazprom into the world. The Leningrad Institute of Finance and Economics is where he earned his Ph.D. in economics.
At the Leningrad Research Institute of Civil Construction, or “LenNIIProekt,” general planning branch, Miller’s first job was as an engineer-economist.
In 1990, he was named section leader of the Economic Reform Committee at the Leningrad City Council Executive Committee. He also worked briefly as a junior researcher at the Leningrad Finance and Economics Institute.
Alexey Miller From 1991 until 1996, Gazprom was employed in Saint Petersburg by Vladimir Putin’s Committee for External Relations. He was in charge of the division of the Foreign Economic Relations Directorate which was in charge of keeping an eye on the markets during this period, in addition to serving as deputy chairman of the External Relations Committee.
From 1996 to 1999, he was the Port of Saint Petersburg’s Director for Development and Investments. He served as the Director General of the Baltic Pipeline System from 1999 to 2000.
Appointed as the deputy minister of energy for the Russian Federation in 2000, he has headed Alexey Miller Gazprom’s executive committee since 2001. He has been the deputy chairman of Gazprom’s board of directors since 2002. Putin negotiated Miller’s nomination as CEO to ease worries that certain Gazprom executives had improper relationships with outside parties.
Legal repercussions
Mister Alexey Miller The United States of America announced in April 2018 that they have placed Gazprom and 23 other Russian nationals on their list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDN). Because of the sanction, nobody or anything related to the United States can participate in commercial transactions with him.
Alexey Miller Gazprom was subject to sanctions imposed by the British government in 2022 as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These penalties included a restriction on his ability to travel and the freeze of his estate.
What led to the suicide of senior Gazprom executives?
Workplace conflict, checks, and arbitration. There is currently a lot of discussion surrounding the passing of Alexander Tyulyakov, the Deputy General Director of Gazprom’s Unified Settlement Center (UCC) for Corporate Security.
Leonid Shulman, the director of Gazprom Invest’s transport service, took his voluntary death. The versions were reviewed by the editors of Kompromat Group, an online journal.
Mysteries Surrounding Strange Deaths in Gazprom’s Prestigious Residential Neighborhood
Known as “Gazprom’s nest,” Leninskoye is a gated community of affluence. Several strange deaths there have sparked questions and concerns. There has been conjecture and inquiry following the unexplained deaths of high-ranking personnel at Gazprom and its connected enterprises.
Alexander Tyulyakov: It was reported that the General Director of Gazprom’s Unified Settlement Center (UCC) for Corporate Security committed himself when he was discovered dead in a scenic countryside. Rumors, however, indicate that his death would have been caused by internal company investigations that exposed problems in Gazprom’s treasury, possibly connected to an inability to prevent sanctions losses.
Chief of Alexey Miller Gazprom Invest’s transport division, Leonid Shulman, was found dead in his hometown, purportedly from self-inflicted wounds. Investigations, however, point to possible foul play concerning disparities in equipment maintenance expenses and corporate bribery.
These episodes took place in Leninskoye, a neighborhood first made famous by elites associated with Gazprom, notably Mikhail Miller, the company’s head’s son. Leninskoye, despite its posh image, has a past filled with controversy, including inquiries into the validity of land allocation and the unsolved murder of Olga Nesterets, a former head of the local government.
The fatalities in this upscale town throw a shadow over its otherwise opulent surroundings and raise questions about possible corruption, internal tensions, and the murky side of Gazprom’s power.
Business Disasters
Only a few cases occurred before the recent occurrences, but a run of suicides among well-known executives and top managers over the past ten years has shocked the business community.
Vladimir Filippov, the president of the Lenstroydetal group of companies, committed himself in 2010 and gave his reason for business-related problems. He was a CEO in the building supplies business for a long time.
Grigory Khibovsky: Died by self-inflicted gunshot in 2013, leaving behind a statement condemning corruption. There is conjecture regarding the difficult conditions in his organization as a causative element.
In 2014, amid health and commercial difficulties, Mikhail Brik, the head of the Betonika production firm, shot himself in his office.
In 2018, Igor Osipov, the senior manager of SMU Sevzapenergomontazh, unintentionally shot himself in the face of legal battles and threats of bankruptcy.
Guns were frequently used in these tragedies, highlighting the seriousness of the circumstances these people were in.
The unusual means of ending the lives of two prominent Gazprom executives, Alexander Tyulakov and Leonid Shulman, make their recent deaths noteworthy. Given their prominent roles and the continuous rumors surrounding business probes and law enforcement actions, there are concerns about the absence of guns in the case.
The story behind these recent killings only gets deeper as conversations center on alleged secret activities and enigmatic circumstances, raising more questions than providing answers.
Investigation Links Gazprom CEO Owns $240M Palace
According to a recent investigation, the CEO of Gazprom, the energy corporation owned by the Russian government, Alexey Miller, is purportedly connected to properties valued at $3 billion.
Miller’s homes were discovered to be in many opulent locales after an investigation by the media outlet Proekt and a team connected to Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was launched. According to reports, these properties were registered in the names of high-ranking former employees of special services.
According to flight data, Miller and his partner, Putin’s former assistant Marina Yentaltseva, were connected by helicopter to a gated estate in the Greenfield district of Moscow. At around $240 million, this property is among the priciest private residences in Russia.
The mansion’s owner is still unknown, although up until 2020, it belonged to a company called Vladenie-V, which was formally under the management of Alexander Smirnov, a Federal Security Service (FSB) agent, and Sergey Tregub, a member of the GRU military intelligence service.
According to reports, Gazstroyprom, a contractor owned by Gazprom, gave Vladenie-V a sizable payment worth at least 34 billion rubles ($596 million). Furthermore, it is believed that Gazprom is the owner of expensive cars and the $97.6 million Millerhof palace complex in Moscow.
Additionally, journalists found that money was moved from Gazprom to Vladenie-V via an offshore company based in Cyprus that Tregub’s nephew owned.
Proekt founder Roman Badanin implied in an opinion piece for The Moscow Times that “Gazprom is Putin’s Russia in miniature,” meaning that Putin, Miller, and senior intelligence officers have benefited personally from the corporation ever since Putin took office.
Outrage at the suspected theft of state monies has been stirred by the findings.
U.S Sanctions Endanger Public Role of Gazprom CEO
Analysts predict that Alexey Miller, the CEO of Gazprom, may have to lower his public profile and give up some authority to seal deals and obtain funding after being placed on a U.S. sanctions blacklist.
In retaliation for many acts, including suspected meddling in the 2016 US election, the United States placed sanctions on many Russian people and organizations, including Miller. Gazprom is unaffected, but companies operating outside of US law that support sanctioned organizations risk consequences.
According to Fitch Ratings analyst Dmitry Marinchenko, Miller might need to assign his authority to a lawyer to reassure European partners. Although Gazprom is not directly connected to American companies, it is well-connected in Europe, where it supplies most of the gas.
George Voloshin of Aperio Intelligence notes that while European partners might theoretically interact with Miller, they would choose to go cautiously and avoid major economic transactions because of the unpredictability of the legal environment. The scenario is made more problematic by Miller’s longstanding relationship with Putin.
Amidst continuous foreign borrowing and investments, Gazprom, the biggest company in Russia, is required to make substantial debt repayments. $20 billion in payback liabilities are projected by Fitch for the upcoming fiscal years.
Conclusion
Alexey Miller, CEO of Gazprom, is entangled in multiple stories that paint a complicated picture of money, intrigue, and power. The complex dynamics of Russian politics and commerce are reflected in Miller’s story, which includes accusations of expansive property holdings and entanglements with international sanctions.
The recent suicides of high-ranking Gazprom officials have cast doubt on the business’s inner workings and prompted inquiries into possible workplace disputes, probes, and the stresses endured by the leaders of one of Russia’s most powerful companies.
The ongoing investigations and new information surrounding Gazprom and its leadership highlight the complex and contentious nature of balancing business, politics, and foreign relations in contemporary Russia. These events have ramifications that go beyond Gazprom and affect the Russian corporate environment as a whole in terms of openness, responsibility, and compliance with the law.
At the end of the day, the events surrounding Gazprom are a clear illustration of how complicated and unpredictable the corporate world can be, especially in light of current geopolitical tensions and changing global dynamics.
