The Fraud Behind Recession Proof Blueprint: Covering Up Scandals and Controlling Online Discourse – Part 1

Intelligence Line By Intelligence Line
1 Min Read

What Happened?

Recession Proof Blueprint, a company that promotes itself as a financial education platform designed to help people thrive during economic downturns, has recently come under fire for allegedly concealing its shady past. Reports have surfaced accusing the company of misleading marketing tactics, questionable business practices, and potential financial fraud. Instead of addressing these concerns transparently, Recession Proof Blueprint has reportedly engaged in aggressive efforts to suppress damaging news.

From leveraging online reputation management services to filing legal complaints against critics, the company appears determined to bury negative information that could tarnish its image. Former customers and business associates have raised serious complaints, including accusations of false promises, mismanagement of funds, and inadequate support. These efforts to silence critics and manipulate the narrative raise concerns about the company’s ethics and legitimacy, especially in an industry where trust and transparency are critical to success.

 class=

Despite these attempts to hide its controversial past, ongoing investigations and whistleblower accounts continue to reveal troubling details about Recession Proof Blueprint’s operations. The company’s struggle to manage its reputation highlights the difficulties businesses face when trying to censor the internet in an era where transparency is increasingly demanded by consumers and regulators alike.

Recession Proof Blueprint

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.

FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.

Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.

By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Recession Proof Blueprint and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…

List of Fake Copyright Notices for Recession Proof Blueprint

Evidence and Screenshots

Only Recession Proof Blueprint Benefit from this crime.

 class=

Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Recession Proof Blueprint from Google, we assume Recession Proof Blueprint or someone associated with Recession Proof Blueprint is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Recession Proof Blueprint. In this case, Recession Proof Blueprint, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.

So, who tf is Recession Proof Blueprint?

Recession Proof Blueprint is a company that offers financial education and mentoring programs, claiming to teach individuals how to achieve financial independence, particularly during economic downturns. The business is marketed as a solution for people looking to create sustainable wealth through various investment strategies, business opportunities, and financial tools. However, despite its positive branding, Recession Proof Blueprint has faced significant criticism and allegations of unethical practices.

Why Is Recession Proof Blueprint Trying to Censor the Internet?

Recession Proof Blueprint appears to be attempting to censor the internet to protect its reputation from the growing volume of negative reviews, complaints, and accusations regarding its business practices. The company has been linked to a series of concerns involving misleading advertising, financial mismanagement, and customer dissatisfaction. By censoring or suppressing critical information online, the company likely aims to prevent potential customers from being discouraged by negative feedback, which could affect its sales and public image.

The company has reportedly used various tactics to manage its reputation, including issuing legal threats, employing online reputation management services, and attempting to remove negative reviews or complaints from forums and websites. This effort to control the narrative is likely a response to the widespread dissatisfaction voiced by former customers who felt misled or taken advantage of by the company.

Major Concerns, Complaints, and Accusations Against Recession Proof Blueprint

Recession Proof Blueprint has been the subject of numerous complaints, ranging from unethical business practices to concerns over financial transparency. Here are the major issues that have been raised against the company:

1. Misleading Marketing and False Promises

One of the most common complaints about Recession Proof Blueprint is that its marketing makes promises that are not delivered in practice. Customers have reported that the company promises guaranteed results, financial independence, or a quick path to wealth, but many find that the actual content and strategies provided fall short of these lofty claims.

  • Unrealistic expectations: According to several reviews and complaints, the company’s promotional materials create the impression that customers can achieve significant financial success easily, but once enrolled, they discover that the strategies are either basic or impractical for their situations.

2. High Fees and Questionable Value

Many customers have expressed frustration over the high fees charged by Recession Proof Blueprint for access to its financial education programs. Several complaints indicate that the value of the information provided is not worth the cost, and customers feel that they have been overcharged for services that do not meet expectations.

  • Excessive costs: Numerous reviews point out that the company charges large sums of money upfront, with limited refund options, leaving customers financially strained after investing in the program. Some have accused the company of using high-pressure sales tactics to convince them to purchase costly packages.

3. Lack of Transparency and Refund Issues

Customers have also raised concerns about the company’s lack of transparency, particularly when it comes to refund policies and service details. Many have reported that when they attempt to request refunds or clarify the terms of the services, they encounter resistance or receive inadequate customer support.

  • Refund complaints: The Fairshake complaint forum includes testimonies from customers who were unable to get refunds despite dissatisfaction with the program. These refund requests are often met with delays, evasive responses, or outright refusals, leading to frustration and financial loss.

4. Customer Service Problems

In addition to refund issues, many customers have complained about poor customer service from Recession Proof Blueprint. Complaints mention long response times, lack of helpful support, and difficulty reaching company representatives to resolve issues.

  • Lack of support: Multiple reviews indicate that once customers have paid for the program, the level of service drops significantly, with limited assistance or guidance available when needed.

5. Reputation Management and Censorship Efforts

Recession Proof Blueprint has also been accused of attempting to suppress negative reviews and complaints by hiring reputation management services to bury critical content. The company may also use legal intimidation tactics to prevent dissatisfied customers from sharing their experiences online, thus manipulating its public image.

  • Review manipulation: Some reports suggest that positive reviews or testimonials may be manufactured or incentivized to offset the wave of negative feedback, creating a skewed representation of customer satisfaction on certain review platforms.

Recession Proof Blueprint’s efforts to censor the internet and suppress negative feedback are driven by growing concerns about the company’s misleading marketing practices, high fees, lack of transparency, and poor customer service. Complaints from dissatisfied customers, as outlined in sources like Scamadviser and Fairshake, suggest that the company may be engaging in unethical behavior to maintain a positive public image while failing to deliver on its promises of financial success. As more complaints and accusations surface, Recession Proof Blueprint’s attempts to control its online narrative may only fuel further scrutiny from both consumers and regulators.

Potential Consequences for Recession Proof Blueprint

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Recession Proof Blueprint Complaints

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)). 

Is Recession Proof Blueprint Committing a Cyber Crime?

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Recession Proof Blueprint have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Recession Proof Blueprint is certainly keeping interesting company here….

Recession Proof Blueprints Fake DMCA

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

What was Recession Proof Blueprint trying to hide?

Recession Proof Blueprint is reportedly trying to suppress a variety of adverse news, bad reviews, complaints, and allegations that have surfaced online. These efforts appear to be aimed at protecting its reputation and preventing potential customers from being deterred by negative experiences shared by others. Below are the key issues and documents that Recession Proof Blueprint is likely attempting to hide:

1. Misleading Marketing and False Promises

One of the most common criticisms of Recession Proof Blueprint is the claim that the company uses deceptive marketing tactics to lure customers into buying its financial education programs. Many customers have complained that the company promises quick wealth, financial independence, or significant business success, only to deliver underwhelming content that does not align with these grand claims.

  • Exaggerated claims: Numerous reviews accuse the company of making unrealistic promises about the potential outcomes of their program, which has led to dissatisfaction among many customers who feel misled.

2. High Costs and Questionable Value

Several complaints highlight that the cost of enrolling in Recession Proof Blueprint’s programs is disproportionately high compared to the actual value delivered. Customers have raised concerns that the courses are overpriced and do not provide unique or actionable insights that justify the significant fees charged.

  • Overpriced services: Some customers claim that the information provided in the programs is either generic or easily accessible elsewhere for free or at a much lower cost. Many feel that they have been overcharged for services that ultimately don’t help them achieve the financial success promised.

3. Refund Issues

A major source of customer frustration revolves around refund policies. Customers have reported difficulty in obtaining refunds after realizing that the program did not meet their expectations. The company has been accused of having unclear or restrictive refund policies that make it difficult for dissatisfied clients to get their money back.

  • Refund complaints: The Fairshake complaint forum includes multiple accounts of customers who have been denied refunds or have faced long delays and unresponsive customer service when trying to get their money back after being unsatisfied with the product.

4. Poor Customer Service

Another recurring complaint is the poor quality of customer service provided by Recession Proof Blueprint. Many customers report difficulties in reaching support teams and receiving timely or helpful responses when they encounter problems with the program or seek refunds.

  • Unresponsive customer support: Reviews mention that customer service is often unresponsive or dismissive, leaving clients feeling neglected and unable to resolve their issues with the company.

5. Reputation Management and Censorship Efforts

Recession Proof Blueprint appears to be actively trying to suppress negative information and reviews online. This includes removing or burying bad reviews and using legal threats to intimidate critics. The company is likely engaging in online reputation management strategies to promote positive content and drown out negative feedback, making it difficult for potential customers to find accurate information about the experiences of others.

  • Censorship tactics: Some customers and reviewers suggest that Recession Proof Blueprint attempts to remove or downplay critical reviews on popular review sites. There have also been accusations that the company uses fake positive reviews to balance out the negative ones.

6. Allegations of False Testimonials

There have been allegations that some of the positive testimonials and success stories promoted by Recession Proof Blueprint may be exaggerated or entirely fabricated. These testimonials are used as part of the company’s marketing campaigns to attract new customers, but critics have raised doubts about their authenticity.

  • Questionable testimonials: Some customers have expressed skepticism about the success stories featured in the company’s promotional materials, suggesting that these might not reflect the typical experiences of most customers.

7. Potential Legal Issues

While there is no direct documentation of ongoing legal battles, the nature of the complaints—especially around refunds, misrepresentation, and potentially fraudulent business practices—suggests that Recession Proof Blueprint may be facing legal challenges or could be vulnerable to future lawsuits. The company may be trying to prevent these issues from becoming public knowledge.

8. Low Trust Rating on Scamadviser

According to the Scamadviser website, Recession Proof Blueprint has a low trust rating, which raises red flags about the company’s credibility. The platform assesses websites based on various factors, including user reviews, customer feedback, and online behavior, suggesting that there are concerns about the company’s legitimacy and the trustworthiness of its business practices.

  • Trust issues: Scamadviser notes that the company’s trust score is impacted by factors such as negative reviews, customer complaints, and concerns over the value of the services offered.

Recession Proof Blueprint is likely trying to hide a wide range of negative information and complaints, including accusations of misleading marketing, high costs, poor customer service, refund refusals, and questionable business practices. The company appears to be engaged in reputation management efforts to bury negative reviews and maintain a positive public image, but the growing volume of complaints suggests that many customers feel dissatisfied with their experience. As more reviews and complaints surface, it may become increasingly difficult for the company to suppress the adverse information surrounding its business.

TAGGED:
Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!