What Happened?
Alexander Horst Riedinger, a name recently tied to a potential cryptocurrency scandal in Austria, has come under scrutiny for allegedly attempting to conceal a questionable past and censor damaging news. Riedinger, associated with the company CoinsPaid, has been accused of being involved in dubious activities within the crypto sector. Reports indicate that CoinsPaid, which presents itself as a payment gateway for cryptocurrency transactions, may have ties to illicit operations, casting doubt on Riedinger’s business dealings.
In response to these allegations, it appears that Riedinger has been actively working to suppress critical reports and negative press. Media outlets have highlighted attempts to remove unfavorable content or discredit sources that publish damaging information about his past and business practices. This strategy of censorship raises concerns about the extent of Riedinger’s involvement in the alleged misconduct and suggests that more may be hidden beneath the surface.
For potential investors and the broader crypto community, Riedinger’s actions highlight the importance of transparency. His reported efforts to hide negative press only fuel speculation about his role in the ongoing controversy, urging caution for anyone considering engagement with CoinsPaid or related ventures.
Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)
Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.
List of Fake Copyright Notices for Alexander Horst Riedinger
| Number of Fake DMCA Notice(s) | 1 |
| Lumen Database Notice(s) | https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43858296 |
| Sender(s) | FinTelegram |
| Date(s) | Aug 16, 2024 |
| Fake Link(s) Used by Scammers | https://fintelegram.com/investigative-report-allegations-of-money-laundering-tax-fraud-and-compliance-issues-against-crypto-payment-processor-coinspaid/ |
| Original Link(s) Targeted | https://wienerzocker.com/2024/05/09/potenzieller-krypto-skandal-in-osterreich-oder-wer-kennt-coinspaid-und-alexander-horst-riedinger/ |
Evidence and Screenshots
How do we investigate fake DMCA notices?
To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.
FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.
Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.
What was Alexander Horst Riedinger trying to hide?
Alexander Horst Riedinger is a figure associated with the cryptocurrency space, most notably linked to the company CoinsPaid, a payment processing service for digital currencies. CoinsPaid allows businesses and individuals to process crypto transactions securely and efficiently, positioning itself as a key player in the growing crypto ecosystem. However, Riedinger’s reputation has recently come under fire due to his alleged involvement in suspicious activities within the cryptocurrency world. While he has kept a relatively low profile, Riedinger has become the subject of controversy, particularly in Austria, where his business dealings are being scrutinized.
Riedinger’s association with CoinsPaid has been tainted by accusations of misconduct and concerns over his business practices. Below is a breakdown of the adverse news, bad reviews, complaints, and allegations that he is reportedly trying to keep from public view:
1. Alleged Involvement in a Crypto Scandal in Austria
Recent reports, particularly those from Austrian media outlets like WienerZocker, have tied Riedinger to a potential cryptocurrency scandal. While the full extent of his involvement remains unclear, the articles suggest that CoinsPaid may be involved in illicit financial activities, including the facilitation of money laundering through its payment processing system. These allegations have prompted investigations, as Austria’s financial regulators seek to uncover whether CoinsPaid and Riedinger are involved in illegal schemes.
The scandal paints a troubling picture of how CoinsPaid may have been used as a vehicle for criminal enterprises, enabling them to launder money through cryptocurrency. This involvement, if proven, could not only tarnish Riedinger’s reputation but also impact the legitimacy of CoinsPaid within the broader cryptocurrency industry.
2. Attempts to Censor Damaging News
In response to these allegations, Riedinger has reportedly made concerted efforts to suppress negative press and censor damaging information. According to sources, Riedinger and his team have sought to remove or silence critical reports that delve into his questionable business dealings. This strategy appears to include the issuing of legal threats to media outlets and journalists who have reported on the ongoing investigations.
The effort to control the narrative and minimize public scrutiny of his actions suggests that Riedinger is keen to avoid further damage to his reputation. The active attempts to censor media coverage raise serious concerns about transparency and accountability, leading some to question what else might be hidden.
3. Regulatory Concerns and Lack of Transparency
The lack of transparency surrounding Riedinger’s business operations is another significant issue. CoinsPaid, though a growing player in the cryptocurrency world, operates in a highly unregulated market. Reports suggest that Riedinger has used this lack of regulation to his advantage, potentially engaging in practices that would not withstand scrutiny in more regulated financial sectors.
Critics have pointed to the lack of oversight as a key factor that allowed questionable transactions to occur through CoinsPaid’s platform. Furthermore, there are suspicions that Riedinger has made little effort to comply with international anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations, which are crucial for any legitimate financial operation. This disregard for proper compliance raises red flags about the ethical standards of Riedinger’s businesses.
4. Complaints from Users and Partners
In addition to the regulatory concerns, several users and partners of CoinsPaid have lodged complaints regarding the platform’s operations. Some have reported unexpected transaction delays and inconsistencies in the company’s services, which they claim resulted in financial losses. These complaints suggest that the problems within CoinsPaid may go beyond simple mismanagement and could point to deeper systemic issues under Riedinger’s leadership.
These grievances have not only appeared on social media but have also found their way onto various review platforms. However, there are claims that efforts have been made to suppress these negative reviews, with reports that some critical user feedback has been removed or buried, limiting the visibility of the complaints.
5. Legal and Financial Allegations
There are also allegations regarding Riedinger’s possible involvement in other financial misconduct beyond the CoinsPaid scandal. Some reports suggest that he may have engaged in tax evasion or other forms of financial fraud through his businesses. These allegations remain speculative, but they add to the growing cloud of suspicion surrounding Riedinger’s activities. If these claims hold weight, they could result in legal action or further regulatory investigations, compounding the already troubling situation.
These allegations point to a pattern of questionable behavior that Riedinger seems eager to hide from public view. By limiting access to critical information and avoiding transparency, he may be attempting to prevent these legal and financial issues from coming to light.
Alexander Horst Riedinger’s involvement with CoinsPaid and his alleged attempts to suppress negative news raise significant concerns about his business practices. From potential ties to a cryptocurrency scandal in Austria to accusations of financial misconduct, Riedinger’s actions have come under increased scrutiny. His reported attempts to censor damaging news only further suggest that there may be more troubling issues lurking behind the scenes.
For investors, partners, and users of CoinsPaid, these developments are cause for caution. The growing number of complaints, regulatory concerns, and efforts to hide unfavorable information make it clear that there are serious questions surrounding Riedinger’s leadership and the integrity of his operations. Transparency is a critical component in the cryptocurrency space, and Riedinger’s reported efforts to avoid it suggest that the full truth may still be hidden.
Only Alexander Horst Riedinger benefits from this crime.
Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Alexander Horst Riedinger from Google, we assume Alexander Horst Riedinger or someone associated with Alexander Horst Riedinger is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Alexander Horst Riedinger. In this case, Alexander Horst Riedinger, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.
How do we counteract this malpractice?
Once we ascertain the involvement of Alexander Horst Riedinger (or actors working on behalf of Alexander Horst Riedinger), we will inform Alexander Horst Riedinger of our findings via Electronic Mail.
Our preliminary assessment suggests that Alexander Horst Riedinger may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Alexander Horst Riedinger, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Alexander Horst Riedinger to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.
Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –
- Inform Google about the fraud committed against them.
- Inform the victims of the fake DMCA about their websites.
- Inform relevant law enforcement agencies
- File counter-notices on Google to reinstate the ‘removed’ content
- Publish copies of the ‘removed’ content on our network of 50+ websites
By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Alexander Horst Riedinger and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…
Since Alexander Horst Riedinger made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and our original review of Alexander Horst Riedinger, including but not limited to user contributions, remain a permanent record for anyone interested in Alexander Horst Riedinger.
A case perfect for the Streisand effect…
Potential Consequences for Alexander Horst Riedinger
Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.
Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.
Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).
Is Alexander Horst Riedinger Committing a Cyber Crime?
Yes, it seems so. Alexander Horst Riedinger used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Alexander Horst Riedinger could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.
Faced with these limitations, some companies like Alexander Horst Riedinger have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.
Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Alexander Horst Riedinger is certainly keeping interesting company here….
