Roman Sledziejowski: Unraveling the $3.6 Million Financial Scam Claims

Intelligence Line By Intelligence Line
14 Min Read

Originally Syndicated on May 14, 2024 @ 9:57 am

Roman Sledziejowski, a former broker at Greenpoint Securities Responds to Fraud Claims

Ken Thompson, the Brooklyn District Attorney, revealed today that a former Greenpoint securities dealer has been indicted. The person is accused of committing first-degree felony theft along with other related offenses.

The person under investigation is charged with embezzling a total of $3.6 million that a Polish businessman had given him to invest.

According to the District Attorney’s statement, the defendant is alleged to have betrayed the trust that their regular client had placed in them by embezzling a sizable quantity of money.

The authorities will not give up on their mission to recover the victim’s funds and ensure that the offender is held accountable for his actions.

Roman Sledziejowski, a guy who was born in Memphis, Tennessee, and had previously lived in Ossining, New York, came before Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Danny Chun for an arraignment.

The person concerned is presently facing a detailed complaint comprised of sixteen charges. These accusations include grand theft, money laundering, document fabrication, and illegal possession of a counterfeit document.

The person in question is charged with several offenses, including one first-degree grand theft crime, one first-degree cash laundering offense, seven first-degree charges of falsifying company documents, and seven second-degree counts of possessing a forged document. The maximum jail sentence for the accused person could be 25 years if they are proven guilty of the main accusation.

According to the statement made available by the District Attorney, it has been established that the person in issue possessed a current broker license and was appropriately registered with FINRA during the years 1998–2012.

He was also the Chief Executive Officer of TWS Financial, LLC, also known as Trade Wall Street, which was located in Manhattan’s Greenpoint area in Brooklyn.

Roman Sledziejowski has been ordered to appear in court and is required to post bail, which can be either $100,000 in cash or a $250,000 bond.

According to the claims, the complainant, a successful immigrant business owner, was approached by the accused, a Polish national, at a social event. After twenty years of trying to build a relationship on a human level, the person in issue became the victim’s financial counselor—that is, a broker.

Talking in Polish, the victim and Roman Sledziejowski exchanged messages several times a month and scheduled monthly get-togethers at the victim’s office or the Greenpoint location.

Due to their lack of knowledge and comprehension of the American economy, the victim was dependent on the advice given by the other party.

The accused person is charged with either building a relationship of trust with the victim over time, betraying their moral duties as a broker, or taking advantage of the victim’s confidence in order to commit theft.

With the assistance of the other party, the victim moved money from his personal and company bank accounts to the one Roman Sledziejowski had chosen.

According to the allegations, the defendant promised the victim that their money would be split among many investment options. Nevertheless, he moved the money to his funds and subsequently to funds that belonged to other people rather than investing it.

The District Attorney claims that in an effort to hide his offense, Roman presented fake documents to an innocent party, constituting an act of concealment.

The aforementioned documentation seemed to confirm the transactions that were carried out on the victim’s behalf or the account reports that showed balances that matched the client’s impression of his account.

However, there are allegations that the target’s bank account balance was exhausted to zero because neither of the transactions was completed. Roman is charged with stealing around 3.6 million dollars from the victim’s account as a result of the fraudulent scheme.

The District Attorney’s office received an official complaint from the defendant’s brokers claiming they were entitled to compensation, according to the statement released by the District Attorney. The previously indicated accusation led to the discovery of an alleged fraud.

Felice Sontupe, an associate district attorney and head of the Illegal Activities Division, is in charge of the person in question. Furthermore, Patricia McNeill, the deputy head of the District Attorney’s Investigative Section, and William E. Schaeffer, the executive assistant to the district attorney, have considerable authority over their actions.

Case Study #1

Sledziejowski, Roman Wrobel, V.

The complainants’ ex-daughter-in-law, Monika Wrobel, has submitted a move to dismiss the case. She claims in her move that Elzbieta Sledziejowska and Jerzy Sledziejowski, the complainants, have continuously disregarded the discovery rules.

Throughout his marriage to the other party, Roman Sledziejowski, the couple’s son, allegedly received a $240,000 loan from the complainants.

The parties referred to as Roman and the complainant gradually drifted apart. Roman’s debt to his family was divided between the parties by the executed separation agreement, which also required the party being sued to agree to assume responsibility for it. This lawsuit was started by the complainants to get the loaned money returned.

The complainants, according to the defendant, allegedly disregarded the disclosure orders and demands. In their reply to the complaint, the complainants claim to have complied with all of the court’s discovery requirements. The opposing party’s concerns regarding the complainants’ disclosures and the complainants’ subsequent responses will be looked at one after the other.

The attorney’s declaration, which was filed with the current action, includes all bank records and also includes scanned copies of checks from three banks that the complainants did not name in their complaints as the locations of their bank accounts.

According to the plaintiff, it is clear that there are other financial institutions from which the plaintiffs have failed to provide declarations, and that the respondents have also failed to provide comprehensive documentation about the payment of funds to their child.

Because Roman’s name is missing from those records, the complainant cannot ascertain the amount of $240,000 that Roman is credited with. The only information provided is a list of all the companies connected to him.

Following the respondent’s submission of her answer to the objection to the petition, Roman presents the affidavit, naming his enterprises as the loan recipients.

Case Study #2

America’s United States and the Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Regarding Roman Sledziejowski

The Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby asks for an order of default concerning Roman Sledziejowski by Rule 155 of the Commission’s Rules.

The following arguments are humbly presented by the Enforcement Division in favor of its motion.

Roman Sledziejowski holds government authorization and is associated with a broker-dealer. Furthermore, he replied that the person in question was determined to have obstructed a Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry.

  • Roman Sledziejowski specifically mentioned

The Securities & Exchange Commission opened an investigation into the acquisition of the assets that made up the trading company TWS and the subsequent distribution of the proceeds from the sale through Innovest’s financial records.

The person intentionally attempted to bribe to affect, hinder, and obstruct the Commission’s investigation.

This was achieved by making vague and fraudulent statements about the stocks and bond transactions that were the focus of the Commissioner’s investigation while testifying before FINRA under oath.

The Rules of Application were properly issued to Roman Sledziejowski, as the Commission’s Demand demonstrating Reason attests to.

Roman Sledziejowski was required by the Rules of Practice to reply within 20 days of the request being properly issued.

  • In summary

The Division humbly requests that the Appeals Commission grant the petition and implement any further remedies for which the Department may be permitted in light of the evidence provided above.

Exposing Deceptive Methods: Roman Sledziejowski’s False Public Relations

Roman Sledziejowski takes on the position of vice-chairman and co-founder of Savant Strategies, a well-known managerial consulting firm with a global reputation for providing middle-market businesses in Latin America, the European Union, and Africa with full-service management consulting solutions.

According to a conversation that the online versions of Global Finance and Banking Review held, Roman Sledziejowski was the high school student who graduated with the highest honors.

Later on, it had more than 10,000 brokers working for it, with more than 700 offices nationwide.

In addition, the business oversaw an outstanding portfolio of assets with a total estimated value of $680 billion. Through a variety of partnerships, the person obtained and then renovated approximately 400 dwelling units.

In addition, Roman Sleziejowski makes claims about the efficient management of his staff and the unique difficulties he faces in his role as manager.

Roman Sleziejowski’s Management Philosophy

According to Roman Sleziejowski, he has a very laissez-faire approach to management. He also reaffirmed his support for the procedure of assigning responsibilities and tasks to specific colleagues in conjunction with a systematic manner of monitoring their progress.

The essential component of this approach is the need to have a great deal of faith in the skill and diligence of your employees.

Finding the Team Management Aspect That Is the Most Difficult

Roman Sleziejowski claims that he constantly keeps a cool head and makes wise decisions when faced with difficulties that affect the business as a whole.

When significant challenges arise, it becomes extremely difficult for team members to stay focused, motivated, and resilient.

Therefore, the main focus of this interview is the fake PR team that worked with Roman Sleziejowski to spread positive questions about him in order to make him seem real and credible to the public.

So, the fake PR team that the person in question employs helps to maintain his positive public image, which in turn helps to foster his general public appeal in a very positive way.

Roman Sledziejowski: who is he?

American-Polish businessman Roman Sledziejowski is the Vice Chairman of Savant Strategies, a well-known leadership advisory organization in the world.

Roman Sledziejowski began his professional career at the age of seventeen in New York City, working part-time for the elite Travelers Group while completing his high school education.

He was class president in high school and then proceeded to major in Economics at Columbia University.

He also competed in a variety of interscholastic track and field events while attending the university, representing his school in multiple locations throughout the state of New York. You can discover more about him by clicking on the following link: https://www.linkedin.com/in/roman-sledziejowski-8464b611/

The Bottom Line 

Concerns regarding trust, responsibility, and moral behavior in the financial industry have been raised by the accusations made against Roman Sledziejowski regarding his alleged involvement in a $3.6 million financial scam.

The claims listed above suggest that a Polish entrepreneur may have misappropriated funds meant for investments.

Maintaining a strong commitment to transparency and integrity is crucial, particularly when managing the financial assets of third parties. The truth of these accusations will be determined by the courts, and if found guilty, he will have to live with the consequences of his actions.

This specific case serves as a vivid example of the necessity of moral standards and ongoing oversight in the banking industry to protect the financial interests and assets of all stakeholders.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!