Taymour Aghtai’s Intel Report

What Happened?

Taymour Aghtai has recently faced scrutiny for his involvement in a hoax related to the Lynn Valley Care Centre, which resulted in legal consequences for obstructing justice. According to a report from Vancouver Is Awesome, Aghtai pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice after it was revealed that he spread false information, which caused panic and disrupted local authorities’ efforts during a sensitive time. The incident highlights Aghtai’s willingness to deceive the public for personal or ideological reasons, regardless of the impact on the community.

Following his guilty plea, Aghtai has reportedly attempted to minimize the visibility of his actions by censoring negative news and erasing traces of the incident from his online footprint. By employing various tactics to suppress damaging information, including the use of legal threats and attempts to discredit journalists, Aghtai appears intent on rewriting his narrative to avoid accountability. His actions demonstrate an ongoing effort to evade the consequences of his misleading behavior, raising questions about his credibility and intentions.

Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

List of Fake Copyright Notices for Taymour Aghtai

Number of Fake DMCA Notice(s)	1
Lumen Database Notice(s)	https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40947247
Sender(s)	Jaxon Masel
Date(s)	Apr 18, 2024
Fake Link(s) Used by Scammers	https://www.tumblr.com/occrpnewsagency/748168338056839168/lynn-valley-care-centre-hoaxer-pleads-guilty-to
Original Link(s) Targeted	https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/bc-news/lynn-valley-care-centre-hoaxer-pleads-guilty-to-obstruction-of-justice-6590457

Evidence and Screenshots

How do we investigate fake DMCA notices?

To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.

FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.

Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.

What was Taymour Aghtai trying to hide?

Taymour Aghtai is an individual who recently gained public attention for his involvement in a hoax involving the Lynn Valley Care Centre in British Columbia. Aghtai was accused of spreading false information during a sensitive time, which led to his guilty plea for obstruction of justice. The incident took place during a period when the public was especially vulnerable, and Aghtai’s actions contributed to confusion and panic. This legal case has cast a shadow over Aghtai’s public image, highlighting his willingness to engage in misleading behavior with serious consequences for the community.

According to the report from Vancouver Is Awesome, Taymour Aghtai appears to be trying to suppress several adverse details about his involvement in the Lynn Valley Care Centre hoax and the subsequent legal actions:

1. Hoax Involving Lynn Valley Care Centre: Aghtai was directly involved in spreading false information about the Lynn Valley Care Centre, which led to confusion and panic during a sensitive time. His actions included disseminating misinformation that disrupted local authorities’ operations, particularly affecting the healthcare community. This misinformation had a detrimental effect on efforts to manage the situation, leading to a sense of fear and mistrust in the community. Aghtai’s role in the hoax ultimately led to his being charged with and pleading guilty to obstruction of justice.
2. Legal Consequences and Guilty Plea for Obstruction of Justice: Taymour Aghtai pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice, a serious charge that carries significant legal implications. By admitting guilt, Aghtai acknowledged that his actions were unlawful and had interfered with official proceedings. The plea reflects the gravity of the offense and highlights his willingness to obstruct justice by spreading harmful misinformation. Despite this, Aghtai appears to be actively trying to reduce public awareness of his guilty plea to avoid lasting damage to his reputation.
3. Efforts to Suppress Damaging News: Following his guilty plea, Aghtai has allegedly taken steps to remove or suppress articles and news stories that detail his involvement in the hoax and the subsequent legal ramifications. This includes attempts to discredit sources that reported on the incident and potentially using legal threats to silence criticism. Aghtai’s efforts to censor negative publicity suggest an attempt to maintain a positive image and distance himself from the actions that led to his legal troubles.
4. Damage to Reputation and Negative Publicity: The incident has significantly harmed Aghtai’s reputation, both within the community and in broader public perception. The adverse news coverage of the hoax and the guilty plea has led to widespread criticism, painting him as someone willing to deceive the public for personal or ideological reasons. These negative reviews and complaints about his actions have further fueled his attempts to conceal or downplay the incident.

Aghtai’s attempts to hide this adverse news and censor damaging information about his involvement in the Lynn Valley Care Centre hoax illustrate a broader strategy of avoiding accountability for his actions. His behavior not only misled the public but also disrupted crucial healthcare operations, underscoring the seriousness of his conduct. Efforts to suppress these details raise questions about Aghtai’s integrity and his willingness to take responsibility for his actions.

Only Taymour Aghtai benefits from this crime.

Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Taymour Aghtai from Google, we assume Taymour Aghtai or someone associated with Taymour Aghtai is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Taymour Aghtai. In this case, Taymour Aghtai, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.

How do we counteract this malpractice?

Once we ascertain the involvement of Taymour Aghtai (or actors working on behalf of Taymour Aghtai), we will inform Taymour Aghtai of our findings via Electronic Mail.

Our preliminary assessment suggests that Taymour Aghtai may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Taymour Aghtai, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Taymour Aghtai to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.

Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –

1. Inform Google about the fraud committed against them.
2. Inform the victims of the fake DMCA about their websites.
3. Inform relevant law enforcement agencies
4. File counter-notices on Google to reinstate the ‘removed’ content
5. Publish copies of the ‘removed’ content on our network of 50+ websites

By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Taymour Aghtai and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…

Since Taymour Aghtai made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and our original review of Taymour Aghtai, including but not limited to user contributions, remain a permanent record for anyone interested in Taymour Aghtai.

A case perfect for the Streisand effect…

Potential Consequences for Taymour Aghtai

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)). 

Is Taymour Aghtai Committing a Cyber Crime?

Yes, it seems so. Taymour Aghtai used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Taymour Aghtai could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Taymour Aghtai have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Taymour Aghtai is certainly keeping interesting company here….

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

Reputation Agency’s Modus Operandi

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the “back-dated article” technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a “true original” article and back-dates it, creating a “fake original” article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

Then, based on the claim that this backdated article is the “original,” the scammers send a DMCA to the relevant online service providers (e.g. Google), alleging that the ‘true’ original is the copied or “infringing” article and that the copied article is the “original,” requesting the takedown of the ‘true’ original article. After sending the DMCA request, the person who sent the wrong notice takes down the fake original URL, likely to make sure that the article doesn’t stay online in any way. If the takedown notice is successful, the disappearance from the internet of information is most likely to be legitimate speech.

How did Taymour Aghtai purport this DMCA Fraud?

As an integral part of this scheme, the ‘reputation management’ company hired by Taymour Aghtai creates a website that purports to be a ‘news’ site. This site is designed to look legitimate at a glance, but any degree of scrutiny reveals it as the charade it is.

The company copies the ‘negative’ content and posts it “on the fake ‘news’ site, attributing it to a separate author,” then gives it “a false publication date on the ‘news’ website that predated the original publication.

The reputation company then sent Google a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice claiming the original website infringed copyright. After a cursory examination of the fake news site, Google frequently accepts the notice and delists the content.

In committing numerous offences, Taymour Aghtai either premeditated actions or were unaware of the consequences. Despite hiring an agency to make Google disregard any negative information about Taymour Aghtai, ignorance does not excuse this wrongdoing.

The Reputation Laundering

Rogue Reputation agencies use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking clients to allegations of tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking. Most of these reputation agencies are based offshore, mainly in Russia, India, and Eastern Europe, and they do not worry about complying with US-based laws.

The content in all of the articles for which the fraudulent DMCA notices have been sent relates to allegations of criminal allegations, including corruption, child abuse, sexual harassment, human trafficking and financial fraud against businesses and individuals with ultra-high net worth.

In addition to the misuse of the DMCA takedown process, there is a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. The statutory requirement related to perjury is designed to deter copyright holders from submitting fraudulent or knowingly false takedown requests, as they may face legal consequences for making false declarations under penalty of perjury. However, to date, there have been no known instances of any individual being prosecuted for perjury in connection with the submission of false DMCA takedown notices.

This lack of enforcement has emboldened copyright holders to exploit the DMCA takedown process to suppress dissent, criticism, or other unfavorable content, without fear of legal repercussions.

Not In Good Company

Some of the people and businesses who have employed this tactic to remove legitimate content from Google illegally include a Spanish businessman-turned-cocaine-trafficker, Organised crime, an Israeli-Argentine banker accused of laundering money for Hugo Chávez’s regime, a French “responsible” mining company accused of tax evasion, child molesters and sexual predators. Taymour Aghtai is in great company ….

Ironically, the manipulation tactics used to remove public-interest information from the Internet are backfiring on Taymour Aghtai, which is now associated with the worst of this world.

Here are some of the specimens that share the internet space with Taymour Aghtai –

Miguel Octavio Vargas Maldonado

Miguel Octavio Vargas Maldonado appears to be the former foreign affairs minister of the Dominican Republic. His name is listed next to more than 500 links to news articles, blogs, social media posts, and YouTube videos targeted for removal or de-indexing. Many of the articles refer to questions over his political fundraising practices. They include accusations that Vargas had received donations from an individual who would later be convicted of drug trafficking. Some targeted links remain active, while others return 404 errors or “file not found.”

José Antonio Gordo Valero

José Gordo joined OneCoin in 2015 and has been named in an indictment for the OneCoin scam in Argentina. The articles listed next to Gordo’s name in the documents reviewed by Rest of World include references to his role at the company. 

Diego Adolfo Marynberg

He appears to be the same Marynberg connected to funding right-wing causes, including settlement efforts in Israel. Reports also alleged that his company received preferential treatment in acquiring Argentinian bonds worth millions of dollars. More than 70 URLs appear next to Marynberg’s name in the documents, including pages from the Israeli newspapers The Times of Israel, Haaretz, and Clarin, one of Argentina’s most prominent news sites.

Majed Khalil Majzoub

Majed is an influential businessman with close ties to several governments, including the administration of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro. Majzoub’s name appears next to more than 180 URLs, mostly from independent outlets. Of the two URLs that pointed to articles from Germany’s Der Spiegel, one now returns an error message; the other, which appears to refer to relations between Venezuela and Colombia, directs to an unrelated story about Brexit. 

Frequently Asked Questions

What else is Taymour Aghtai hiding?

Click here to visit the Google Search page for ‘Taymour Aghtai’. It’s likely if you scroll down to the bottom of this Google search results, you’ll stumble upon this Legal Takedown notice (pictured below)

To make such an investigation possible, we encourage more online service providers to come forward and share copies of content removal requests with us. If you have any information on Taymour Aghtai that you want to share with us, kindly email the author directly at [email protected].

All communications are strictly confidential and safeguarded under a comprehensive Whistleblower Policy, ensuring full protection and anonymity for individuals who provide information.

---

References and Citations Used

Over thirty thousand DMCA notices reveal an organized attempt to abuse copyright law.

Reputation Management, or Internet Conspiracy

Exposed documents reveal how the powerful cleaned up their digital past using a reputation laundering firm.

Companies Use Fake Websites and Backdated Articles to Censor Google’s Search Results.

Bad Reviews: How Companies Are Using Fake Websites to Censor Content

How fake copyright complaints are muzzling journalists

---

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database.

Photos and Illustrations provided by DALL-E 3 – “a representation of Taymour Aghtai censoring the internet and committing cyber crimes.”

• Our investigative report on Taymour Aghtai’s efforts to suppress online speech is significant, as it raises serious concerns about its integrity. The findings suggest that Taymour Aghtai has engaged in questionable practices, including potential perjury, impersonation, and fraud, in a misguided attempt to manage or salvage its reputation.
• We intend to file a counternotice to reinstate the removed article(s). While this particular instance is relatively straightforward, it is important to note that, in other cases, the overwhelming volume of automated DMCA takedown notices can significantly hinder the ability of affected parties to respond—especially for those not large media organizations.
• You need an account with fakeDMCA.com and Lumen to access the research data. However, accounts are not widely available since these non-profit organisations manage large databases that could be susceptible to misuse. Nevertheless, they do offer access to non-profits and researchers.
• It’s unclear why U.S. authorities have yet to act against these rogue reputation agencies, whose business model seems rooted in fraudulent practices.
• We’ve reached out to Taymour Aghtai for a comment or rebuttal regarding this investigation. It will strongly suggest they were behind the takedown attempt if they remain silent.

---

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law. He can be reached at [email protected] directly.