Originally Syndicated on June 5, 2024 @ 2:43 pm
There have been charges that Dr. Safi Chand violated the Veterinary Practice Act. Let’s read the whole report of his behavior below to discover more:
Dr. Safi Chand, a veterinarian from New Market, Maryland, claims to be the proprietor of the New Market Animal Hospital. He claims that he is committed to maintaining your pets’ health and becoming an expert on small animal veterinarian care. Dr. Safi Chand claims to have had extensive expertise and mastered a number of therapies in heated animal emergency centres.
Dr. Safi Chand considers himself a lifesaver, having dedicated his life to improving the lives of small animals in Maryland and beyond.
Dr. Safi Chand, the proprietor of the New Market in reality, claims that he is continually seeking to expand his understanding of veterinary techniques and pet care in order to assist animals live long and healthy lives. Safi believes he deserves recognition for his long experience working in dynamic animal emergency rooms, during which time he developed a variety of tactics.
Dr. Chand broadened his expertise by focusing in emergency department surgery and medicine in 2005, after earning his medical degree from Canada.
Later, he was honoured for his four years of service as an emergency room clinician for CVCA and AVIM, Maryland’s biggest internal medicine and cardiology organization.
Veterinary Practice Act infractions
Safi Chand, Permit No. 6193, and the State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (the “SBVME” or “Board”) have entered into this Consent Agreement and Order (the “Consent Agreement”), dated this 21st day of January 2021. In Docket No. 18-66A, the SBVME accused Dr. Chand of breaching the Veterinary Practice Act, the Agriculture Article, Sections 2-301 to 2-316 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, and related Code of Maryland Regulations (“COMAR”) 15.14.01 to 15.14.17. This Consent Agreement puts an end to those accusations.
In an email to the Board on May 31, 2020, Dr. Safi Chand indicated his desire for the claims to be heard. Following this, the parties began negotiating a settlement. In a letter dated October 16, 2020, Dr. Chand’s lawyer informed the client that his client had chosen to waive the right to a hearing on the charges in Docket No. 18-66A and had also agreed to the terms of this Consent Agreement, which included paying the civil penalties and completing the required continuing education.
According to Maryland law, the SBVME is the entity in charge of awarding licences and enforcing regulations for the delivery of veterinary treatment in this state. This includes conducting enforcement actions against veterinarians who are alleged to have violated the Veterinary Practice Act’s provisions and any associated COMAR guidelines that were developed in compliance with this law.
According to its charter, the SBVME “may decline, suspend, or withdraw any request for registration or a permit, and reprimand or place on probation any licensee if the veterinarian refuses to adhere with Board regulations and rules after receiving a licence.”
The Board may impose a civil punishment of up to $5,000 for a first infraction and $10,000 for a second or subsequent offence, as well as delay or terminate a veterinarian’s licence. The severity of the infringement, the violator’s good faith, any prior violations, and the Board’s regulatory requirements for civil fines are all elements that the Board must consider when deciding the level of a civil penalty.
What was the order?
The State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners has ORDERED the following on January 21, 2021, in light of the aforementioned Statements of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
- Terry Kehne’s 3-year-old male domestic shorthair cat Sylvester was treated inappropriately by Dr. Chand Safi, and as a result, he must pay a $3000 civil fine and serve a one-year suspension.
- Dr. Safi Chand will pay a $3000 civil penalty for failing to create medical records that accurately represent the progress and outcome of the case.
- If Dr. Safi Chand is found to have broken the Code of Professional Conduct by asking another veterinarian if they had paid a pet owner cash throughout the course of their professional engagement, they will face a $500 civil penalty.
- Within six months of the date of this consent order, Dr. Chand must pay the $3,500 non-stayed component of the civil penalty with a check payable to the Maryland Department of Agriculture and clearly marked “SBVME – 18-66A”.
- Dr. Safi Chand will be subject to a year of probation beginning on this day. During the probation period, the veterinarian must follow the terms of this consent agreement as well as all laws and regulations governing the practice of veterinary medicine in this State.The veterinarian must reply promptly to the Board’s requests for copies of medical records to ensure that Board requirements are met, as well as requests for inspections or other records. When a veterinarian on probation is charged with breaking the Veterinary Practice Act, associated laws, or the terms of this Consent Agreement, the Board must finally determine whether the practitioner was in breach. This is known as a probation violation.
- If probation is breached, additional penalties may be imposed, such as the suspension or revocation of the veterinary licence, as well as the lifting of the stay on the portion of the civil penalty that was previously on hold.
- Dr. Chand must also finish the online Medical Record Keeping for Veterinarians training, which Drs. James Wilson and Lance Roasa offer at www.drip.vet, during his probationary period. The CE must be completed and presented to the Board along with proof of completion within six months of the date of this Order. To confirm that Dr. Chand has completed the required CE, the Board may review his CE records at any time.
- Dr. Chand’s name, the number of CE hours earned, the topics covered, and the dates of CE offers must all be included in the paperwork provided by the CE provider. The Board has the right to review CE records for pertinent years to ensure that both the CE that is mandated by this Consent Order and the CE that is needed yearly for all veterinary professionals were completed in full. This CE will not count as the 18 credit hours of CE that are needed each year for re-registration of the veterinary licence.
A few details about animal cruelty
There are many different ways that cruelty to animals is defined, depending on the country or region in which the act occurs. For instance, China did not even recognize animal cruelty as an issue until 2006, when there were no laws in place to forbid it.
In contrast, animal cruelty is strongly disapproved of and frowned upon in America and Europe. The term “animal cruelty” is used to describe any act of violence or neglect that a person commits against an animal. Dog fighting or leaving your dog in a hot car without air conditioning are two instances of this.
The most common kind of cruelty to animals is abuse, which frequently involves something as simple as not giving your pet adequate attention, food, or housing. Neglect can take many forms, such as hoarding, failing to provide medical attention, or abandoning your pet.
Direct abuse is damaging and unhealthy, despite the fact that it occurs less frequently. Humans have long viewed animals as entities that only exist for human benefit. Conventions in contemporary society encourage the careful treatment of animals and, whenever feasible, the avoidance of needless suffering.
Act Concerning Animal Welfare
States of today The term “animal cruelty” is defined differently throughout the United States. For instance, West Hollywood banned the declawing of domestic cats in 2003. Declawing household cats is not illegal in the vast majority of other parts of this country. The major piece of federal legislation addressing animal abuse is the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the AWA into law, making it the first federal law of its kind.
What are the Charges?
Specified species of animals used for research or other purposes are subject to AWA regulations on their care, handling, sale, and transportation. Despite the fact that it only applied to particular animals used for research, this law was the first of its kind in American history and represented a move away from animal cruelty.
A bill that would make torturing animals a federal felony, punishable by fines and up to seven years in federal prison, was recently passed by the US Senate. The bipartisan proposal has won the Senate’s unanimous support, and President Donald Trump is prepared to sign it into law.
Animal cruelty has a penalty, which is outlined in Section 578 of the Missouri Revisor of Statutes. When an animal is purposefully killed or harmed in a way that is against the law, it is considered to have been subject to animal abuse in Missouri. Animal abuse may also be proven by proof of animal neglect, which leaves the animal severely injured.
Unless a person has already been convicted of animal abuse, Missouri classifies animal abuse as a Class A misdemeanour. If such were the case, the offender would face a Class D felony charge, which carries much heavier punishments.
The state of Missouri prohibits neglecting animals as well.
In Missouri, if a person has custody or ownership of an animal yet neglects to provide for its needs, they may be prosecuted for animal neglect. Animal neglect, a Class C misdemeanours punishable by a fine of up to $500 and/or incarceration, can be committed by leaving an animal behind. A Class B misdemeanour punishable by up to one year in jail, a fine of no more than $1,000, or both is brought against the same person if they neglect animals once more.
Conclusion
Finally, the best thing we can say about Dr. Safi Chand is that he actually acts dishonestly in his capacity as a veterinary specialist and treats animals unfairly in his procedures. What do you think about Dr. Safi right now? Is it proper for him to obtain the prestigious position of veterinary and Animal Hospital owner? Are his activities morally right in the eyes of humanity?
On the other hand, I would also mention that Dr. Safi Chand is utilizing fake PR to enhance both his reputation as a person and that of his animal hospital.
