Originally Syndicated on September 25, 2024 @ 6:47 am
What Happened?
Baron Luigi Louis Forino, a figure who once enjoyed considerable influence in certain elite circles, has faced mounting scrutiny as unsettling details about his past have emerged. Known for his connections with controversial figures and a history entwined with dubious activities, Forino has gone to great lengths to suppress these revelations. According to an investigative piece by Mazzetta, Forino has actively worked to censor damaging reports that expose his alleged misconduct, including fraud and his association with criminal networks.
The report delves into Forino’s attempts to quash news stories that reveal a pattern of fraudulent schemes and deceit. One of the most striking aspects of his alleged activities is his involvement in scams, which date back decades and have left a trail of victims across Italy and beyond. These scams reportedly range from financial fraud to questionable dealings within political circles, where Forino positioned himself as a gatekeeper of influence.
In his attempts to conceal this sordid history, Forino has utilized a combination of legal threats, disinformation, and influence over media outlets to silence his critics. From manipulating public perception to erasing online content, his efforts to hide his shady past have raised concerns about accountability and the influence of corrupt figures on public discourse.
Despite his best attempts to control the narrative, independent platforms and investigative journalists have continued to shine a light on his questionable actions. These revelations challenge the carefully curated image Forino has long sought to maintain, highlighting the importance of transparency and the ongoing battle against censorship in the digital age.
Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)
Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.
To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.
FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.
Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.
By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Baron Luigi Louis Forino and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…
List of Fake Copyright Notices for Baron Luigi Louis Forino
| Number of Fake DMCA Notice(s) | 1 |
| Lumen Database Notice(s) | https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40205706 |
| Sender(s) | David James Corp on behalf of ben james |
| Date(s) | March 18, 2024 |
| Fake Link(s) Used by Scammers | https://www.cultnews101.com/2022/02/just-love-bhakti-margas-guru-and-his.html |
| Original Link(s) Targeted | https://mazzetta.wordpress.com/2017/03/16/la-toto-truffa-italiana-ai-nemici-di-trump/ |
Evidence and Screenshots
Only Baron Luigi Louis Forino Benefit from this crime.
Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Baron Luigi Louis Forino from Google, we assume Baron Luigi Louis Forino or someone associated with Baron Luigi Louis Forino is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Baron Luigi Louis Forino. In this case, Baron Luigi Louis Forino, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.
So, who tf is Baron Luigi Louis Forino?
Baron Luigi Louis Forino is a controversial figure with a shadowy background, entangled in allegations of fraud, deceit, and political manipulation. While he presents himself as a legitimate and influential aristocrat, various reports suggest that Forino has been involved in a range of illicit activities, prompting him to attempt to censor information that could tarnish his reputation. His actions are largely aimed at suppressing damaging news, reviews, and allegations that have surfaced, particularly in relation to his questionable dealings and political connections.
Why is Forino Trying to Censor the Internet?
Baron Luigi Louis Forino’s efforts to censor the internet stem from his desire to protect his image and prevent incriminating details from becoming widely known. According to Mazzetta’s investigative article, Forino has been involved in fraudulent activities for years, and the internet has become a platform where his shady past is being exposed. To maintain a façade of legitimacy and avoid accountability, Forino has allegedly resorted to legal threats and manipulation to remove or discredit content that reveals his involvement in scandals.
Forino’s efforts at censorship reflect a broader attempt to control his public persona, especially in light of his connections to controversial political figures and activities. Reports indicate that he has used his influence to suppress negative stories, working to maintain a veneer of respectability while hiding the darker aspects of his career.
Major Concerns, Complaints, and Accusations:
- Fraudulent Schemes: One of the most serious accusations against Forino is his involvement in fraudulent activities. According to the article, Forino has allegedly run scams over many years, including financial fraud and deceptive business practices. These schemes have reportedly targeted a wide range of individuals and entities, causing financial losses for many.
- Political Manipulation: Forino has also been accused of using his connections to meddle in political affairs. The report highlights his association with controversial political figures, including ties to far-right movements and alleged attempts to influence political discourse in favor of his allies. His efforts to gain influence in these circles raise concerns about his intentions and the ethics of his involvement.
- Association with Criminal Networks: Another concerning aspect of Forino’s past is his alleged connection to organized crime and corrupt networks. He is said to have exploited these connections to further his own interests and protect himself from legal consequences. These ties to illicit activities and underworld figures make his attempts to censor damaging information even more critical for him to maintain his public standing.
- Suppression of Critical Media: A key aspect of Forino’s strategy has been the suppression of negative media coverage. The article outlines how he has used legal threats, influence over media outlets, and disinformation campaigns to prevent damaging stories from gaining traction. His efforts have been focused on silencing whistleblowers and independent journalists who expose his wrongdoings, raising concerns about censorship and the erosion of free speech.
These accusations and efforts at censorship reveal a troubling portrait of Baron Luigi Louis Forino, whose shady dealings and attempts to control the narrative continue to generate public concern. Despite his attempts to bury the truth, investigative journalists and online platforms persist in exposing the darker side of his legacy.
Potential Consequences for Baron Luigi Louis Forino
Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.
Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.
Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).
Is Baron Luigi Louis Forino Committing a Cyber Crime?
Yes, it seems so. Baron Luigi Louis Forino used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Baron Luigi Louis Forino could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.
Faced with these limitations, some companies like Baron Luigi Louis Forino have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.
Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Baron Luigi Louis Forino is certainly keeping interesting company here….
The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.
Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.
What was Baron Luigi Louis Forino trying to hide?
Baron Luigi Louis Forino is allegedly trying to hide a series of damaging news stories, bad reviews, complaints, and incriminating documents that reveal his shady past and questionable activities. According to the investigative article on Mazzetta, these efforts involve suppressing a range of issues that, if publicly known, could significantly tarnish his reputation and expose his involvement in various fraudulent and unethical practices. Here are some of the major concerns and allegations he is purportedly attempting to conceal:
1. Fraudulent Schemes:
Forino has been accused of orchestrating a number of scams and fraudulent operations, many of which have defrauded victims of significant sums of money. These schemes reportedly involve deceptive business practices, where individuals or organizations were misled or financially exploited. He has allegedly benefited from these schemes while leaving a trail of victims who suffered financial losses.
2. Political Manipulation and Deception:
A key element of the exposé involves Forino’s alleged attempts to manipulate political discourse and influence outcomes to benefit himself or his associates. The article details his ties to far-right political movements and his involvement in disinformation campaigns aimed at influencing public opinion, particularly in connection to figures like Donald Trump. This raises concerns about his involvement in underhanded political dealings and corrupt activities within elite circles.
3. Connections to Organized Crime:
One of the more severe accusations involves Forino’s reported connections to organized crime. He is alleged to have used these criminal networks to protect his interests, avoid legal consequences, and carry out his fraudulent schemes. These ties to illicit groups further darken his public image and contribute to the urgency of his attempts to suppress these stories.
4. Bad Reviews and Complaints:
Numerous bad reviews and complaints have surfaced from individuals who claim to have been deceived or harmed by Forino’s actions. Whether in business dealings, political ventures, or personal relationships, these complaints often describe a pattern of manipulation, dishonesty, and exploitation. Many former associates have voiced grievances about being misled or financially harmed by his schemes.
5. Legal Threats and Censorship:
Forino has reportedly used legal threats as a tool to censor negative information online. By targeting independent journalists, bloggers, and critics, he has attempted to quash any coverage that sheds light on his fraudulent activities or criminal connections. This includes pressuring media outlets to remove or alter stories that portray him in a negative light, as well as intimidating whistleblowers from coming forward with damaging information.
6. Suppressed Documents:
Documents that could potentially expose Forino’s involvement in illegal activities are among the key pieces of evidence he is trying to keep out of public view. These include financial records, legal filings, and correspondence that may provide proof of his fraudulent schemes or ties to criminal organizations. Forino’s efforts to suppress these documents demonstrate his desire to maintain control over the narrative surrounding his reputation.
By attempting to erase or discredit these negative reports and documents, Baron Luigi Louis Forino seeks to protect his public image and avoid legal and social consequences. Despite his efforts to silence critics and whistleblowers, investigative reporting continues to reveal the scope of his alleged misconduct and fraudulent activities.
Reputation Agency’s Modus Operandi
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the “back-dated article” technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a “true original” article and back-dates it, creating a “fake original” article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
Then, based on the claim that this backdated article is the “original,” the scammers send a DMCA to the relevant online service providers (e.g. Google), alleging that the ‘true’ original is the copied or “infringing” article and that the copied article is the “original,” requesting the takedown of the ‘true’ original article. After sending the DMCA request, the person who sent the wrong notice takes down the fake original URL, likely to make sure that the article doesn’t stay online in any way. If the takedown notice is successful, the disappearance from the internet of information is most likely to be legitimate speech.
How did Baron Luigi Louis Forino purport this DMCA Fraud?
As an integral part of this scheme, the ‘reputation management’ company hired by Baron Luigi Louis Forino creates a website that purports to be a ‘news’ site. This site is designed to look legitimate at a glance, but any degree of scrutiny reveals it as the charade it is.
The company copies the ‘negative’ content and posts it “on the fake ‘news’ site, attributing it to a separate author,” then gives it “a false publication date on the ‘news’ website that predated the original publication.
The reputation company then sent Google a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice claiming the original website infringed copyright. After a cursory examination of the fake news site, Google frequently accepts the notice and delists the content.
In committing numerous offences, Baron Luigi Louis Forino either premeditated actions or were unaware of the consequences. Despite hiring an agency to make Google disregard any negative information about Baron Luigi Louis Forino, ignorance does not excuse this wrongdoing.
The Reputation Laundering
Rogue Reputation agencies use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking clients to allegations of tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking. Most of these reputation agencies are based offshore, mainly in Russia, India, and Eastern Europe, and they do not worry about complying with US-based laws.
The content in all of the articles for which the fraudulent DMCA notices have been sent relates to allegations of criminal allegations, including corruption, child abuse, sexual harassment, human trafficking and financial fraud against businesses and individuals with ultra-high net worth.
In addition to the misuse of the DMCA takedown process, there is a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. The statutory requirement related to perjury is designed to deter copyright holders from submitting fraudulent or knowingly false takedown requests, as they may face legal consequences for making false declarations under penalty of perjury. However, to date, there have been no known instances of any individual being prosecuted for perjury in connection with the submission of false DMCA takedown notices.
This lack of enforcement has emboldened copyright holders to exploit the DMCA takedown process to suppress dissent, criticism, or other unfavorable content, without fear of legal repercussions.
Not In Good Company
Some of the people and businesses who have employed this tactic to remove legitimate content from Google illegally include a Spanish businessman-turned-cocaine-trafficker, Organised crime, an Israeli-Argentine banker accused of laundering money for Hugo Chávez’s regime, a French “responsible” mining company accused of tax evasion, child molesters and sexual predators. Baron Luigi Louis Forino is in great company ….
Ironically, the manipulation tactics used to remove public-interest information from the Internet are backfiring on Baron Luigi Louis Forino, which is now associated with the worst of this world.
Here are some of the specimens that share the internet space with Baron Luigi Louis Forino –
Miguel Octavio Vargas Maldonado
Miguel Octavio Vargas Maldonado appears to be the former foreign affairs minister of the Dominican Republic. His name is listed next to more than 500 links to news articles, blogs, social media posts, and YouTube videos targeted for removal or de-indexing. Many of the articles refer to questions over his political fundraising practices. They include accusations that Vargas had received donations from an individual who would later be convicted of drug trafficking. Some targeted links remain active, while others return 404 errors or “file not found.”
José Antonio Gordo Valero
José Gordo joined OneCoin in 2015 and has been named in an indictment for the OneCoin scam in Argentina. The articles listed next to Gordo’s name in the documents reviewed by Rest of World include references to his role at the company.
Diego Adolfo Marynberg
He appears to be the same Marynberg connected to funding right-wing causes, including settlement efforts in Israel. Reports also alleged that his company received preferential treatment in acquiring Argentinian bonds worth millions of dollars. More than 70 URLs appear next to Marynberg’s name in the documents, including pages from the Israeli newspapers The Times of Israel, Haaretz, and Clarin, one of Argentina’s most prominent news sites.
Majed Khalil Majzoub
Majed is an influential businessman with close ties to several governments, including the administration of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro. Majzoub’s name appears next to more than 180 URLs, mostly from independent outlets. Of the two URLs that pointed to articles from Germany’s Der Spiegel, one now returns an error message; the other, which appears to refer to relations between Venezuela and Colombia, directs to an unrelated story about Brexit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Baron Luigi Louis Forino commit a cyber crime?
Yes, filing a fake DMCA notice is illegal. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) allows copyright holders to issue takedown notices to protect their works from unauthorized use online. However, submitting a false DMCA notice can result in legal consequences.
Under the DMCA, a person knowingly submitting a false copyright claim can be subject to penalties, including damages. DMCA notices require the filer to certify, under penalty of perjury, that the content infringes their copyright. If the notice is found to be fraudulent or made in bad faith, the filer can face.
What are the potential consequences for Baron Luigi Louis Forino?
Civil lawsuits: The affected party can sue for damages, legal fees, and other costs.
Perjury charges: False certification in a DMCA notice can result in perjury-related penalties, which vary by jurisdiction.
Other legal penalties: Fines or other penalties depending on the case
Did Baron Luigi Louis Forino commit a Civil or a Criminal offense?
Perjury is a criminal offense, not a civil crime. It involves intentionally lying or making false statements under oath, typically in a court of law or other legal proceedings, such as affidavits or depositions.
Criminal charges: Perjury is prosecuted as a criminal act, and a conviction can lead to fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the false statement and its impact on the case.
Felony status: In many jurisdictions, perjury is classified as a felony, which carries more severe penalties than misdemeanour offences.
So, while it may affect civil cases, the crime of perjury itself is strictly criminal.
What is the Streisand effect?
The key idea behind the Streisand effect is that efforts to restrict information can backfire, often causing the information to gain more attention than it would have otherwise. This effect is widespread in the digital age, where users quickly notice and spread censorship efforts on social media and other platforms.
Trying to suppress something can unintentionally lead to it becoming more visible.
Can Baron Luigi Louis Forino purge its Digital past?
Once information is uploaded to the internet, it can be replicated, shared, archived, or stored across multiple servers. If Baron Luigi Louis Forino manage to delete the original post or file, copies may remain accessible in other places, such as web archives, screenshots, or other users’ devices.
In practice, completely erasing content from the internet can be extremely difficult due to how widely information can spread and be stored. Thus, the idea that “the Internet never forgets” reflects the challenge of entirely removing digital content once it has been shared.
What is our next move?
Critical Intel will, in its capacity, do all it can to hold someone responsible for this incident. Here is what we are preparing for –
Since Baron Luigi Louis Forino made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and our original review of Baron Luigi Louis Forino, including but not limited to user contributions, remain a permanent record for anyone interested in Baron Luigi Louis Forino.
A case perfect for the Streisand effect…
What else is Baron Luigi Louis Forino hiding?
Click here to visit the Google Search page for ‘Baron Luigi Louis Forino’. It’s likely if you scroll down to the bottom of this Google search results, you’ll stumble upon this Legal Takedown notice (pictured below)
To make such an investigation possible, we encourage more online service providers to come forward and share copies of content removal requests with us. If you have any information on Baron Luigi Louis Forino that you want to share with us, kindly email the author directly at [email protected].
All communications are strictly confidential and safeguarded under a comprehensive Whistleblower Policy, ensuring full protection and anonymity for individuals who provide information.
References and Citations Used
Over thirty thousand DMCA notices reveal an organized attempt to abuse copyright law.
Reputation Management, or Internet Conspiracy
Exposed documents reveal how the powerful cleaned up their digital past using a reputation laundering firm.
Companies Use Fake Websites and Backdated Articles to Censor Google’s Search Results.
Bad Reviews: How Companies Are Using Fake Websites to Censor Content
How fake copyright complaints are muzzling journalists
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database.
Photos and Illustrations provided by DALL-E 3 – “a representation of Baron Luigi Louis Forino censoring the internet and committing cyber crimes.”
- Our investigative report on Baron Luigi Louis Forino’s efforts to suppress online speech is significant, as it raises serious concerns about its integrity. The findings suggest that Baron Luigi Louis Forino has engaged in questionable practices, including potential perjury, impersonation, and fraud, in a misguided attempt to manage or salvage its reputation.
- We intend to file a counternotice to reinstate the removed article(s). While this particular instance is relatively straightforward, it is important to note that, in other cases, the overwhelming volume of automated DMCA takedown notices can significantly hinder the ability of affected parties to respond—especially for those not large media organizations.
- You need an account with fakeDMCA.com and Lumen to access the research data. However, accounts are not widely available since these non-profit organisations manage large databases that could be susceptible to misuse. Nevertheless, they do offer access to non-profits and researchers.
- It’s unclear why U.S. authorities have yet to act against these rogue reputation agencies, whose business model seems rooted in fraudulent practices.
- We’ve reached out to Baron Luigi Louis Forino for a comment or rebuttal regarding this investigation. It will strongly suggest they were behind the takedown attempt if they remain silent.
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law. He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
