Originally Syndicated on March 28, 2023 @ 11:57 am
Table of Contents
Birth: September 10, 1958
Citizenship: Russia
Professional experience/official position: Member of the Legislative Assembly of the Chelabin Region; co-owner and president of the CPC; Yucalsoloto Group of Businesses.
Education
Konstantin Strukov graduated from the Integrated Mechanization of Underground Mining Development and the Magnito-Gorno-Methallurgical Institute of Technology in 1980.
Developing the technique for the development of a gold habitat at the high depths of the Kokkkar deposit was the focus of a candidate’s dissertation that was defended in 2003.
Career
• 1980–1987: worked as a mining master, chief of station, chief engineer, and mine director in businesses in Kazakhstan and Bashkortostan.
• Director General of the UO Group of Companies as of November 1997
• Chairman of the Southern Group of Companies’ Board of Directors as of June 2001.
• Director General of the Celabin Coal Company since 2001
• Director-General of the Celabin Coal Company from 2002 to 2006
• 2007: President of the UO’s Union Group of Businesses’ OO’s Supervisory Corporation.
Activities in the public eye and the political sphere
• Constituency representation in the Legislative Assembly of the Chelabin Region
• participant in the political process as a member of the Political Council of the Chelabin Regional Office of the United Russia Party.
Crimes
When “Chelyabinsk Coal Company” Plc. was founded in 2001, Strukov was appointed CEO. The corporation and its affiliate, the Korkinsky coal strip mine, soon found themselves at odds. This business was once a division of “Chelyabinskugol” Plc. During corporatization in 1994, “Chelyabinskugol” Plc received a 60% interest in the company. The assets of Chelyabinskugol were really “leased” by “Chelyabinsk Coal Company” Plc. with the right of redemption under the terms of the 2003 agreement, it turned out.
Konstantin Strukov thus held a majority interest in the Korkinsky coal strip mine. The battle for it began. Yury Kuzmenko, the company’s director and a student of Strukov, submitted an arbitration declaration in order to introduce a temporary observation at the business. The request was granted by the court. However, the decision about the outside manager was put off indefinitely. Yet the court hired a third-party manager. Konstantin Strukov desired to appeal this judgment to a higher court.
The Kommersant (Ekaterinburg) No. 91 (2694) on May 28, 2003 is the source
A miners’ demonstration was conducted in Kopeisk, Latvia, in front of the municipal hall in January 2004. They objected to the management decisions made by “CCC,” which had decreased leave from 66 to 42 days and instituted a 7-hour workday. Administrative pressure was also used against the miners’ union members, who were threatened with losing their pay if they didn’t quit. The miners requested that the prosecutor and the Russian Labor Inspection investigate the leadership’s activities.
The prosecutor’s office could not find any irregularities, but the Russian Labor Inspection issued a directive to reinstate the previous working conditions. But until this was accomplished, objections persisted. Several cities also had protests in favor of the Kopeisk mining workers.
A second union member, Eduard Kintsler, declared a hunger strike following trade union head Vladimir Rodnyuk. Strukov also made a request for approval to implement a 36-hour workday at a company in an appeal to Aleksander Pochinok, Minister of Labour and Social Development.
Kommersant (Ekaterinburg) No. 3 (2842) from January 13, 2004 as a source
The Ministry of Labor commission began evaluating the “CCC’s” leadership abilities in February. With the justification that he otherwise would not be able to satisfy the standards of the union, the administration started preparing some of the mines for closure. Konstantin Strukov, in the meantime, informed the Kopeisk mayor, the prosecutors, and the regional government that the city’s mines would be closed due to a lack of workers.
He was unable to meet his duties because of the mines. He requested the mayor to look after the employment of workers and maintain the security of the mines.
Kommersant (Ekaterinburg) No. 22 (2861) from February 7, 2004
The “CCC” leadership said in 2005 that redistribution was a danger to the Chelyabinsk coal market. Concerns were raised when coal users, such as “Chelyabobltopprom” Plc., started purchasing coal from other areas. “CCC” charged the business with switching coal suppliers because it refused to settle its bills for coal that had already been provided.
Nevertheless, “Chelyabobltopprom” claimed that “CCC” was unable to supply the required quantity of coal, forcing them to make purchases from other vendors. Prior to this, “CCC” and RAO UES of Russia were at odds when having switched the Argayashskaya Heat Electropower Station to a higher calorific coal.
Kommersant (Ekaterinburg) No. 69 (3153), 19 April 2005
Konstantin Strukov announced the suspension of investment initiatives for the development of “C” in August 2006 due to a fall in corporate coal usage.
Coal had been rejected because of its subpar quality. Its superior grade significantly raised the price. A mine was shut down. Moreover, the energy sector started to switch to gas. Yet, the regional government sought to help the “CCC” since it saw the business as a social endeavor.
For more articles, click on the link given below:
https://monitor.financescam.com/ru/artyom-filatov/
You may also like:
https://monitor.financescam.com/ru/alexander-efimov-fima-banshchik/
